STAT3

associated omics data
signal transducer and activator of transcription 3Genealiases: ADMIO · ADMIO1 · APRF · HIES

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored STAT3 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. STAT3 expression is associated with patient survival in 27 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in SKCM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, STAT3 is differentially expressed in 7, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Additionally, STAT3 RNA expression shows 19,735 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Together, these results highlight SKCM, KICH, and KIRP as cancer lineages where STAT3 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes STAT3 survival associations across molecular data types. STAT3 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (27), followed by mutation status (4) and mass-spec protein abundance (3). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
STAT3 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier27SKCM (65)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier4UCS (36)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier3LUAD (34)view →
This table ranks reproducible STAT3 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High STAT3 expression shows unfavorable associations in LGG, KIRP and UVM, but favorable associations in SKCM, HNSC and ESCA. The SKCM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify SKCM as the clearest survival context for STAT3 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
SKCMOSMedianAll0.3930.253<.00165view →
LGGOSTertileAll0.3360.552<.00147view →
HNSCDFSTertileAll0.6980.519<.00143view →
KIRPDFSMedianIII,IV0.4530.709.02136view →
UVMDFSQuartileII,III,IV0.2880.763.00834view →
ESCADFSMedianIII,IV0.5480.285.00130view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 27 lineages →

STAT3-SKCM (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for STAT3 RNA expression in SKCM: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes STAT3 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 7, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 5. The strongest signals are observed in KICH for RNA and HNSC for protein.
STAT3 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot7KICH (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot5HNSC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for STAT3. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. STAT3 shows lower tumor expression in KICH and LUSC and higher tumor expression in STAD, ESCA, HNSC and CHOL. The KICH box plot shows higher STAT3 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −2.108, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KICHAllIII,IV−2.108<.00111view →
STADAllAll+0.563.0034view →
ESCAAllAll+0.981.0123view →
HNSCAllAll+0.363.0143view →
CHOLAllII,III,IV+0.870.0332view →
LUSCAllAll−0.286.0062view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 7 lineages →

STAT3-KICH

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for STAT3 in KICH.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with STAT3 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, STAT3 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with KIRP recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, STAT3 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in BLOOD_Lymphoma, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LUNG_SCLC and UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA19,735KIRP (9276)view →
Protein (mass-spec)8,645GBM (2937)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)11,147GBM (2062)view →
RNA4,270CCRCC (1008)view →
Mutation
RNA2,606UCEC (2405)view →
Protein (RPPA)23UCEC (21)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
RNA2,217BLOOD_Lymphoma (635)view →
CRISPR1,864LUNG_SCLC (153)view →
RNA
RNA12,324UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT (4626)view →
Function (RNA)5,278BLOOD_Lymphoma (1629)view →
Mutation
Mutation6,582LARGE_INTESTINE (5004)view →
RNA567LARGE_INTESTINE (540)view →
Protein (RPPA)
Function (RNA)5,223BLOOD_Lymphoma (1260)view →
Function (CRISPR)3,758BLOOD_Leukemia (360)view →