GHR

associated omics data
growth hormone receptorGenealiases: GHBP · GHIP

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored GHR profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. GHR expression is associated with patient survival in 27 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, GHR is differentially expressed in 16, with the highest sampling consensus in THCA. Additionally, GHR RNA expression shows 19,121 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight KIRC, THCA, and THYM as cancer lineages where GHR shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes GHR survival associations across molecular data types. GHR RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (27), followed by mutation status (3). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
GHR data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier27KIRC (192)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier3SKCM (13)view →
This table ranks reproducible GHR RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High GHR expression shows unfavorable associations in BLCA, HNSC and THCA, but favorable associations in KIRC, MESO and LIHC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for GHR RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCDFSMedianAll0.7290.526<.001192view →
BLCAOSMedianAll0.5300.681<.001170view →
MESOOSMedianAll0.6620.426<.001101view →
LIHCOSTertileAll0.7570.546<.001101view →
HNSCOSMedianAll0.2760.511<.00141view →
THCAOSMedianAll0.8990.975.00332view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 27 lineages →

GHR-KIRC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for GHR RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes GHR tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 16. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA.
GHR data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot16THCA (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for GHR. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. GHR shows lower tumor expression in THCA, KIRP, LUAD, COAD, LIHC and STAD. The THCA box plot shows higher GHR RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −2.270, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
THCAAllIV−2.270<.00111view →
KIRPMaleAll−1.947<.00111view →
LUADFemaleIII,IV−1.872<.00111view →
COADAllIV−1.700<.00111view →
LIHCMaleII,III,IV−2.400<.0019view →
STADAllAll−1.489<.0019view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 16 lineages →

GHR-THCA

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for GHR in THCA.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with GHR in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, GHR shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, GHR RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in LIVER, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LARGE_INTESTINE and BONE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA19,121THYM (7952)view →
Protein (mass-spec)17,545UCEC (5089)view →
Mutation
RNA2,578UCEC (1648)view →
Protein (RPPA)27UCEC (21)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
RNA64LSCC (64)view →
Function (mass-spec)41LSCC (41)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,690LIVER (133)view →
RNA1,462LARGE_INTESTINE (291)view →
RNA
RNA7,890BONE (2649)view →
Function (RNA)3,704BONE (1240)view →
Mutation
Mutation3,634LARGE_INTESTINE (2449)view →
RNA49LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (26)view →
shRNA
CRISPR1,262BLOOD_Leukemia (119)view →
shRNA1,228SKIN (135)view →