CGRRF1

associated omics data
cell growth regulator with ring finger domain 1Genealiases: CGR19 · RNF197

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored CGRRF1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. CGRRF1 expression is associated with patient survival in 24 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, CGRRF1 is differentially expressed in 14, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, CGRRF1 RNA expression shows 19,785 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Together, these results highlight KIRC, and ACC as cancer lineages where CGRRF1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes CGRRF1 survival associations across molecular data types. CGRRF1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (24), followed by mutation status (2) and mass-spec protein abundance (7). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
CGRRF1 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier24KIRC (55)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier7HNSC (33)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier2SKCM (18)view →
This table ranks reproducible CGRRF1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High CGRRF1 expression shows unfavorable associations in LIHC, ACC and SCLC, but favorable associations in KIRC, SKCM and MESO. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for CGRRF1 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCDFSMedianAll0.7020.554<.00155view →
LIHCOSMedianAll0.5930.776<.00143view →
ACCDFSTertileAll0.2700.736<.00142view →
SCLCDFSQuartileAll0.1810.886.00242view →
SKCMOSQuartileAll0.3690.210<.00128view →
MESOOSMedianIII,IV0.7940.291.00127view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 24 lineages →

CGRRF1-KIRC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CGRRF1 RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes CGRRF1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 14, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 5. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
CGRRF1 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot14KIRC (12)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot5CCRCC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for CGRRF1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. CGRRF1 shows lower tumor expression in KIRC, COAD, THCA, LUSC and BLCA and higher tumor expression in LIHC. The KIRC box plot shows higher CGRRF1 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.696, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCFemaleII,III,IV−0.696<.00112view →
LIHCMaleII,III,IV+0.798<.0019view →
COADFemaleAll−0.692<.0019view →
THCAMaleIV−0.650<.0019view →
LUSCAllIII,IV−1.395<.0018view →
BLCAMaleAll−0.661<.0018view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 14 lineages →

CGRRF1-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for CGRRF1 in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with CGRRF1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, CGRRF1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ACC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, CGRRF1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SKIN, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BLOOD_Lymphoma and BLOOD_Leukemia.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA19,785ACC (9588)view →
Protein (mass-spec)18,789CCRCC (5690)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)12,935GBM (3741)view →
RNA4,513GBM (1081)view →
Mutation
RNA723UCEC (685)view →
Protein (RPPA)6UCEC (6)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,887SKIN (198)view →
RNA1,501BLOOD_Lymphoma (279)view →
RNA
RNA9,304BLOOD_Leukemia (4222)view →
Function (RNA)4,043BLOOD_Leukemia (1350)view →
shRNA
RNA1,761KIDNEY (524)view →
shRNA1,604LUNG_SCLC (181)view →
Mutation
Mutation324BLOOD_Leukemia (192)view →
RNA2BLOOD_Leukemia (2)view →