YIPF1

associated omics data
Yip1 domain family member 1Genealiases: DJ167A19.1 · FinGER1 · YIPFbeta3A · Yip5a

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored YIPF1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. YIPF1 expression is associated with patient survival in 21 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in LIHC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, YIPF1 is differentially expressed in 14, with the highest sampling consensus in THCA. Additionally, YIPF1 protein abundance shows 30,173 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in BRCA. Together, these results highlight LIHC, THCA, and BRCA as cancer lineages where YIPF1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes YIPF1 survival associations across molecular data types. YIPF1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (21), followed by mutation status (2) and mass-spec protein abundance (9). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
YIPF1 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier21LIHC (73)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier9GBM (18)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier2CESC (12)view →
This table ranks reproducible YIPF1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High YIPF1 expression shows unfavorable associations in LIHC, LGG and ACC, but favorable associations in STAD, PRAD and COAD. The LIHC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify LIHC as the clearest survival context for YIPF1 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
LIHCOSTertileAll0.5510.796<.00173view →
LGGOSMedianAll0.7350.886<.00150view →
ACCOSMedianAll0.7910.946.00143view →
STADOSQuartileIII,IV0.7870.507.00531view →
PRADDFSMedianAll0.9330.839<.00118view →
COADOSMedianIII,IV0.8790.670.00216view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 21 lineages →

YIPF1-LIHC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for YIPF1 RNA expression in LIHC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes YIPF1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 14, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 9. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA and LUAD for protein.
YIPF1 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot14THCA (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot9LUAD (9)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for YIPF1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. YIPF1 shows lower tumor expression in THCA and KICH and higher tumor expression in LIHC, LUAD, BLCA and BRCA. The THCA box plot shows higher YIPF1 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −1.540, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
THCAAllIV−1.540<.00111view →
KICHFemaleII,III,IV−1.271<.00110view →
LIHCAllIII,IV+1.024<.0019view →
LUADFemaleIII,IV+0.771<.0019view →
BLCAAllIII,IV+0.676<.0019view →
BRCAAllIII,IV+0.697<.0018view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 14 lineages →

YIPF1-THCA

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for YIPF1 in THCA.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with YIPF1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, YIPF1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with BRCA recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, YIPF1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in LARGE_INTESTINE, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in SKIN and BLOOD_Leukemia.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)30,173BRCA (7245)view →
RNA17,889LSCC (6261)view →
RNA
RNA17,693ACC (9735)view →
Protein (mass-spec)12,428BRCA (5001)view →
Mutation
RNA261UCEC (205)view →
Infiltrating cells6UCEC (6)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,858LARGE_INTESTINE (178)view →
RNA1,504SKIN (222)view →
RNA
RNA8,456BLOOD_Leukemia (2338)view →
Function (RNA)2,840BREAST (614)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
RNA1,483LUNG_SCLC (208)view →
Protein (mass-spec)1,383LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (411)view →
Mutation
Mutation1,481BLOOD_Leukemia (1024)view →
RNA9LARGE_INTESTINE (9)view →