SH3PXD2A

associated omics data
SH3 and PX domains 2AGenealiases: FISH · SH3MD1 · TKS5

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored SH3PXD2A profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. SH3PXD2A expression is associated with patient survival in 27 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, SH3PXD2A is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, SH3PXD2A protein abundance shows 22,504 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in GBM. Together, these results highlight UVM, KIRC, and GBM as cancer lineages where SH3PXD2A shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes SH3PXD2A survival associations across molecular data types. SH3PXD2A RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (27), followed by mutation status (4) and mass-spec protein abundance (5). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
SH3PXD2A data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier27UVM (127)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier5HNSC (11)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier4THCA (13)view →
This table ranks reproducible SH3PXD2A RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High SH3PXD2A expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, MESO, ACC, OV and BLCA, but favorable associations in UCS. The UVM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UVM as the clearest survival context for SH3PXD2A RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UVMDFSMedianAll0.3800.830<.001127view →
MESOOSMedianAll0.2840.483.00193view →
ACCDFSMedianAll0.1550.673<.00191view →
OVOSTertileAll0.2330.352.00158view →
UCSDFSTertileIII,IV0.5460.199.00342view →
BLCADFSTertileIII,IV0.0800.366.00439view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 27 lineages →

SH3PXD2A-UVM (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for SH3PXD2A RNA expression in UVM: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes SH3PXD2A tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 6. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
SH3PXD2A data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot11KIRC (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot6CCRCC (12)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for SH3PXD2A. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. SH3PXD2A shows lower tumor expression in UCEC and BLCA and higher tumor expression in KIRC, HNSC, LIHC and LUSC. The KIRC box plot shows higher SH3PXD2A RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.125, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCFemaleIII,IV+1.125<.00111view →
HNSCAllAll+0.669<.0019view →
LIHCFemaleII,III,IV+1.183<.0018view →
UCECAllAll−1.435<.0016view →
BLCAAllAll−0.653.0036view →
LUSCMaleAll+0.665<.0014view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 11 lineages →

SH3PXD2A-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for SH3PXD2A in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with SH3PXD2A in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, SH3PXD2A shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with GBM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, SH3PXD2A RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SOFT_TISSUE, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LARGE_INTESTINE and BLOOD_Leukemia.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)22,504GBM (7735)view →
RNA11,641CCRCC (2955)view →
RNA
RNA20,245THYM (8808)view →
Protein (mass-spec)14,087PDAC (4859)view →
Mutation
RNA4,535UCEC (4156)view →
Protein (RPPA)45UCEC (40)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,557SOFT_TISSUE (179)view →
RNA1,107LARGE_INTESTINE (179)view →
RNA
RNA8,341BLOOD_Leukemia (2352)view →
Function (RNA)3,477SKIN (652)view →
Mutation
Mutation4,675LARGE_INTESTINE (3398)view →
RNA198BLOOD_Leukemia (133)view →
shRNA
shRNA990LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (153)view →
RNA941SKIN (325)view →