NR1H4

associated omics data
nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group H member 4Genealiases: BAR · FXR · HRR-1 · HRR1 · PFIC5 · RIP14

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored NR1H4 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. NR1H4 expression is associated with patient survival in 21 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, NR1H4 is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, NR1H4 RNA expression shows 15,702 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Together, these results highlight UVM, KIRC, and ACC as cancer lineages where NR1H4 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes NR1H4 survival associations across molecular data types. NR1H4 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (21), followed by mutation status (6) and mass-spec protein abundance (1). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
NR1H4 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier21UVM (62)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier6UCEC (30)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier1CCRCC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible NR1H4 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High NR1H4 expression shows unfavorable associations in THYM and BRCA, but favorable associations in UVM, ESCA, KIRC and UCS. The UVM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p = .001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UVM as the clearest survival context for NR1H4 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UVMOSTertileAll0.8160.459.00162view →
THYMDFSTertileAll0.6140.925<.00145view →
BRCADFSTertileAll0.1401.000.00136view →
ESCADFSMedianIII,IV0.4660.242.01034view →
KIRCDFSMedianIV0.6960.532.01323view →
UCSDFSTertileII,III,IV0.5960.240.01118view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 21 lineages →

NR1H4-UVM (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for NR1H4 RNA expression in UVM: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes NR1H4 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 1. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
NR1H4 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot11KIRC (12)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot1CCRCC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for NR1H4. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. NR1H4 shows lower tumor expression in KICH, COAD, LUSC and BRCA and higher tumor expression in KIRC and KIRP. The KIRC box plot shows higher NR1H4 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.263, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCMaleIV+1.263<.00112view →
KICHFemaleII,III,IV−4.790<.00111view →
COADFemaleII,III,IV−2.865<.00111view →
KIRPMaleII,III,IV+1.152<.0016view →
LUSCFemaleAll−0.380<.0014view →
BRCAFemaleAll−0.071.0014view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 11 lineages →

NR1H4-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for NR1H4 in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with NR1H4 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, NR1H4 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ACC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, NR1H4 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SKIN, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LARGE_INTESTINE and LIVER.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA15,702ACC (6987)view →
Function (RNA)6,959TGCT (2438)view →
Mutation
RNA3,164UCEC (2813)view →
Protein (RPPA)39UCEC (38)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)771CCRCC (771)view →
RNA669CCRCC (669)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,653SKIN (155)view →
RNA1,213SKIN (238)view →
Mutation
Mutation5,148LARGE_INTESTINE (4578)view →
RNA236LARGE_INTESTINE (210)view →
RNA
RNA2,840LIVER (903)view →
Function (RNA)1,154LIVER (384)view →
shRNA
shRNA2,177SKIN (385)view →
RNA2,055BREAST (419)view →