HNRNPD

associated omics data
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein DGenealiases: AUF1 · AUF1A · HNRPD · P37 · hnRNPD0

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored HNRNPD profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. HNRNPD expression is associated with patient survival in 28 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, HNRNPD is differentially expressed in 12, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Additionally, HNRNPD protein abundance shows 24,974 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in GBM. Together, these results highlight ACC, HNSC, and GBM as cancer lineages where HNRNPD shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes HNRNPD survival associations across molecular data types. HNRNPD RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (28), followed by mutation status (3) and mass-spec protein abundance (5). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
HNRNPD data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier28ACC (93)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier5CCRCC (29)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier3STAD (36)view →
This table ranks reproducible HNRNPD RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High HNRNPD expression shows unfavorable associations in ACC, KIRP, LIHC and LGG, but favorable associations in BRCA and KIRC. The ACC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify ACC as the clearest survival context for HNRNPD RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
ACCOSMedianAll0.4280.773<.00193view →
KIRPDFSTertileII,III,IV0.1470.605.00468view →
LIHCDFSMedianAll0.3660.501<.00161view →
BRCAOSMedianIII,IV0.6520.389<.00154view →
LGGDFSMedianAll0.7830.878<.00136view →
KIRCDFSMedianAll0.8750.717<.00134view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 28 lineages →

HNRNPD-ACC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for HNRNPD RNA expression in ACC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes HNRNPD tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 12, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 9. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and COAD for protein.
HNRNPD data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot12KIRC (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot9COAD (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for HNRNPD. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. HNRNPD shows higher tumor expression in HNSC, COAD, KIRC, STAD, LIHC and LUSC. The HNSC box plot shows higher HNRNPD RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.936, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
HNSCMaleIII,IV+0.936<.00111view →
COADAllIII,IV+0.803<.00111view →
KIRCFemaleAll+0.470<.00111view →
STADMaleII,III,IV+0.855<.0019view →
LIHCAllII,III,IV+0.767<.0018view →
LUSCMaleII,III,IV+0.763<.0017view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 12 lineages →

HNRNPD-HNSC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for HNRNPD in HNSC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with HNRNPD in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, HNRNPD shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with GBM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, HNRNPD RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SKIN, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in OVARY and BLOOD_Leukemia.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)24,974GBM (8823)view →
RNA12,161GBM (5730)view →
RNA
RNA19,741ACC (10299)view →
Protein (mass-spec)13,545GBM (4750)view →
Mutation
RNA1,578UCEC (1496)view →
Protein (RPPA)19UCEC (19)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,885SKIN (132)view →
RNA1,618OVARY (218)view →
RNA
RNA11,481BLOOD_Leukemia (5896)view →
Function (RNA)5,231BLOOD_Leukemia (2051)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
RNA4,579BLOOD_Leukemia (1580)view →
Function (RNA)2,302BLOOD_Leukemia (656)view →
Mutation
Mutation4,017LARGE_INTESTINE (3866)view →
RNA4BLOOD_Leukemia (1)view →