STAR

associated omics data
Gene

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored STAR profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. STAR expression is associated with patient survival in 26 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, STAR is differentially expressed in 12, with the highest sampling consensus in LUSC. Additionally, STAR RNA expression shows 14,189 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ESCA. Together, these results highlight KIRC, LUSC, and ESCA as cancer lineages where STAR shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes STAR survival associations across molecular data types. STAR RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (26), followed by mutation status (6). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
STAR data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier26KIRC (142)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier6BLCA (33)view →
This table ranks reproducible STAR RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High STAR expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, but favorable associations in HNSC, UVM, LUAD, LGG and PAAD. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for STAR RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCDFSMedianAll0.5220.717<.001142view →
HNSCOSMedianAll0.7670.602<.001131view →
UVMDFSMedianII,III,IV0.7360.408<.001124view →
LUADDFSMedianAll0.4360.287<.001118view →
LGGDFSMedianAll0.8370.635<.00154view →
PAADDFSQuartileII,III,IV0.5190.320.00453view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 26 lineages →

STAR-KIRC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for STAR RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes STAR tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 12. The strongest signals are observed in LUSC for RNA.
STAR data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot12LUSC (7)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for STAR. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. STAR shows lower tumor expression in COAD, BRCA, THCA and PRAD and higher tumor expression in LUSC and HNSC. The LUSC box plot shows higher STAR RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.494, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
LUSCMaleAll+1.494<.0017view →
COADMaleAll−0.148<.0017view →
BRCAFemaleAll−0.182<.0016view →
HNSCAllAll+0.455.0054view →
THCAAllAll−0.161<.0014view →
PRADAllAll−0.194<.0012view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 12 lineages →

STAR-LUSC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for STAR in LUSC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with STAR in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, STAR shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ESCA recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, STAR RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SOFT_TISSUE, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LIVER and BLOOD_Leukemia.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA14,189ESCA (2865)view →
Protein (mass-spec)13,733GBM (5265)view →
Mutation
RNA2,131UCEC (2101)view →
Protein (RPPA)34UCEC (34)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,848SOFT_TISSUE (154)view →
RNA1,238LIVER (155)view →
RNA
RNA8,456BLOOD_Leukemia (3567)view →
Function (RNA)3,826BLOOD_Leukemia (1911)view →
Mutation
Mutation2,425LARGE_INTESTINE (2386)view →
Drug16LARGE_INTESTINE (16)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,801SKIN (220)view →
RNA1,543BONE (201)view →