SEMA6A

associated omics data
semaphorin 6AGenealiases: HT018 · SEMA · SEMA6A1 · SEMAQ · VIA

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored SEMA6A profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. SEMA6A expression is associated with patient survival in 25 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, SEMA6A is differentially expressed in 12, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, SEMA6A RNA expression shows 19,731 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight KIRC, COAD, and THYM as cancer lineages where SEMA6A shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes SEMA6A survival associations across molecular data types. SEMA6A RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (25), followed by mutation status (9) and mass-spec protein abundance (2). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
SEMA6A data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier25KIRC (101)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier9UCEC (18)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier2CCRCC (4)view →
This table ranks reproducible SEMA6A RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High SEMA6A expression shows unfavorable associations in SKCM, THCA, LUAD and STAD, but favorable associations in KIRC and UVM. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for SEMA6A RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCOSQuartileAll0.7750.542<.001101view →
SKCMOSTertileAll0.2420.420<.00168view →
UVMOSTertileAll0.8690.522.00160view →
THCAOSMedianIII,IV0.7430.958.00149view →
LUADDFSTertileIV0.4790.863.01730view →
STADOSQuartileII,III,IV0.3450.610.00722view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 25 lineages →

SEMA6A-KIRC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for SEMA6A RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes SEMA6A tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 12, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 3. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
SEMA6A data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot12KIRC (12)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot3CCRCC (6)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for SEMA6A. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. SEMA6A shows lower tumor expression in COAD, LUAD, THCA and KICH and higher tumor expression in KIRC and KIRP. The COAD box plot shows higher SEMA6A RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −3.147, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
COADFemaleIII,IV−3.147<.00112view →
KIRCFemaleAll+2.580<.00112view →
LUADFemaleIII,IV−2.530<.00111view →
THCAMaleIII,IV−1.395<.00110view →
KIRPMaleII,III,IV+1.507<.0019view →
KICHAllII,III,IV−1.105<.0017view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 12 lineages →

SEMA6A-COAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for SEMA6A in COAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with SEMA6A in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, SEMA6A shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, SEMA6A RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in BREAST, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in SOFT_TISSUE and SKIN.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA19,731THYM (6450)view →
Protein (mass-spec)13,832GBM (5650)view →
Mutation
RNA6,725UCEC (4764)view →
Protein (RPPA)61UCEC (41)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
RNA4,531GBM (4103)view →
Protein (mass-spec)4,058GBM (2906)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,750BREAST (147)view →
RNA1,293SOFT_TISSUE (211)view →
RNA
RNA10,355SKIN (2940)view →
Function (RNA)4,990SOFT_TISSUE (1717)view →
Mutation
Mutation6,665LARGE_INTESTINE (5820)view →
RNA1,427LARGE_INTESTINE (1356)view →
shRNA
shRNA2,455SOFT_TISSUE (420)view →
RNA2,003SOFT_TISSUE (614)view →