Q-omics provides the consensus-scored PLXNB1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. PLXNB1 expression is associated with patient survival in 26 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, PLXNB1 is differentially expressed in 10, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, PLXNB1 protein abundance shows 20,317 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in GBM. Together, these results highlight UVM, KIRC, and GBM as cancer lineages where PLXNB1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for PLXNB1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes PLXNB1 survival associations across molecular data types. PLXNB1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (26), followed by mutation status (12) and mass-spec protein abundance (6). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible PLXNB1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High PLXNB1 expression shows favorable associations in UVM, BLCA, HNSC, KIRP, MESO and LAML. The UVM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UVM as the clearest survival context for PLXNB1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes PLXNB1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 10, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 7. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for PLXNB1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. PLXNB1 shows lower tumor expression in KIRC, KICH and LUAD and higher tumor expression in COAD, LIHC and STAD. The KIRC box plot shows higher PLXNB1 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −1.604, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with PLXNB1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, PLXNB1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with GBM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, PLXNB1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in LUNG_NSCLC_LUSC, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BREAST and BLOOD_Leukemia.
