Q-omics provides the consensus-scored MGAM profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. MGAM expression is associated with patient survival in 24 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, MGAM is differentially expressed in 10, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Additionally, MGAM protein abundance shows 19,055 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LUAD. Together, these results highlight KIRC, KIRP, and LUAD as cancer lineages where MGAM shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for MGAM — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes MGAM survival associations across molecular data types. MGAM RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (24), followed by mutation status (13) and mass-spec protein abundance (4). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible MGAM RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High MGAM expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, LUAD, MESO and LGG, but favorable associations in KIRC and SCLC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for MGAM RNA expression.
This table summarizes MGAM tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 10, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 6. The strongest signals are observed in KIRP for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for MGAM. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. MGAM shows lower tumor expression in KIRP, KICH, COAD and LUSC and higher tumor expression in BRCA and LIHC. The KIRP box plot shows higher MGAM RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −4.166, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with MGAM in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, MGAM shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LUAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, MGAM RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in PANCREAS, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in SOFT_TISSUE and LARGE_INTESTINE.
