LAGE3

associated omics data
L antigen family member 3Genealiases: CVG5 · DXS9879E · DXS9951E · ESO3 · GAMOS2 · ITBA2

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored LAGE3 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. LAGE3 expression is associated with patient survival in 28 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, LAGE3 is differentially expressed in 17, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Additionally, LAGE3 RNA expression shows 18,756 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight KIRP, HNSC, and THYM as cancer lineages where LAGE3 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes LAGE3 survival associations across molecular data types. LAGE3 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (28), followed by mutation status (2) and mass-spec protein abundance (5). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
LAGE3 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier28KIRP (100)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier5HNSC (68)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier2KIRC (12)view →
This table ranks reproducible LAGE3 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High LAGE3 expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRP, KICH, KIRC, LIHC and LGG, but favorable associations in CESC. The KIRP Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRP as the clearest survival context for LAGE3 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRPDFSTertileII,III,IV0.3570.742<.001100view →
KICHDFSMedianIII,IV0.4091.000.00288view →
KIRCOSMedianAll0.8270.930<.00170view →
CESCOSQuartileAll0.8370.326.00152view →
LIHCOSMedianAll0.6050.765<.00152view →
LGGOSTertileAll0.7370.881<.00133view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 28 lineages →

LAGE3-KIRP (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for LAGE3 RNA expression in KIRP: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes LAGE3 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 17, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 4. The strongest signals are observed in HNSC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
LAGE3 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot17HNSC (12)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot4CCRCC (12)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for LAGE3. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. LAGE3 shows higher tumor expression in HNSC, COAD, BLCA, LIHC, STAD and LUAD. The HNSC box plot shows higher LAGE3 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.256, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
HNSCMaleIV+1.256<.00112view →
COADFemaleII,III,IV+1.430<.00111view →
BLCAAllAll+0.841<.00111view →
LIHCMaleII,III,IV+1.812<.0019view →
STADAllII,III,IV+1.257<.0019view →
LUADFemaleIII,IV+1.005<.0019view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 17 lineages →

LAGE3-HNSC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for LAGE3 in HNSC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with LAGE3 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, LAGE3 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, LAGE3 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in CNS, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in PANCREAS and BLOOD_Lymphoma.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA18,756THYM (7316)view →
Protein (mass-spec)10,428LSCC (3465)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)15,180GBM (3443)view →
RNA5,070BRCA (1921)view →
Mutation
RNA56UCEC (55)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
RNA1,982CNS (586)view →
CRISPR1,746PANCREAS (176)view →
RNA
RNA9,305BLOOD_Lymphoma (2781)view →
Function (RNA)3,740SKIN (803)view →
Mutation
Mutation1,413LARGE_INTESTINE (1413)view →
RNA8LARGE_INTESTINE (8)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
RNA847LUNG_SCLC (229)view →
CRISPR746OESOPHAGUS (239)view →