KHDC3L

associated omics data
KH domain containing 3 like, subcortical maternal complex memberGenealiases: C6orf221 · ECAT1 · HYDM2

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored KHDC3L profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. KHDC3L expression is associated with patient survival in 20 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, KHDC3L is differentially expressed in 4, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Additionally, KHDC3L RNA expression shows 8,486 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in TGCT. Together, these results highlight KIRC, HNSC, and TGCT as cancer lineages where KHDC3L shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes KHDC3L survival associations across molecular data types. KHDC3L RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (20), followed by mutation status (7). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
KHDC3L data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier20KIRC (151)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier7LIHC (36)view →
This table ranks reproducible KHDC3L RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High KHDC3L expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, COAD, READ and DLBC, but favorable associations in LGG and THYM. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for KHDC3L RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCDFSMedianAll0.7460.843<.001151view →
COADOSTertileIII,IV0.1780.717<.00166view →
READDFSTertileAll0.1950.593.00648view →
DLBCDFSTertileAll0.5320.940.01030view →
LGGOSMedianAll0.9500.838<.00129view →
THYMDFSMedianIII,IV1.0000.399.00421view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 20 lineages →

KHDC3L-KIRC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for KHDC3L RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes KHDC3L tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 4. The strongest signals are observed in HNSC for RNA.
KHDC3L data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot4HNSC (6)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for KHDC3L. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. KHDC3L shows lower tumor expression in BRCA and LUAD and higher tumor expression in HNSC and KIRC. The HNSC box plot shows higher KHDC3L RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.104, t-test p = .017).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
HNSCAllII,III,IV+0.104.0176view →
BRCAAllAll−0.089<.0014view →
LUADAllIII,IV−0.041.0182view →
KIRCMaleAll+0.019.0062view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 4 lineages →

KHDC3L-HNSC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for KHDC3L in HNSC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with KHDC3L in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, KHDC3L shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with TGCT recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, KHDC3L RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in OESOPHAGUS, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BONE and BLOOD_Lymphoma.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA8,486TGCT (4478)view →
Function (RNA)7,048STAD (5772)view →
Mutation
RNA685UCEC (432)view →
Protein (RPPA)32SKCM (20)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,991OESOPHAGUS (169)view →
RNA1,878BONE (311)view →
RNA
RNA1,399BLOOD_Lymphoma (197)view →
Mutation641BLOOD_Leukemia (534)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,009LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (217)view →
RNA931BREAST (403)view →
Mutation
Mutation687LARGE_INTESTINE (539)view →
RNA10BLOOD_Leukemia (7)view →