CYP2A7

associated omics data
cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily A member 7Genealiases: CPA7 · CPAD · CYP2A · CYPIIA7 · P450-IIA4

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored CYP2A7 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. CYP2A7 expression is associated with patient survival in 13 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in DLBC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, CYP2A7 is differentially expressed in 5, with the highest sampling consensus in LIHC. Additionally, CYP2A7 RNA expression shows 15,451 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight DLBC, LIHC, and THYM as cancer lineages where CYP2A7 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes CYP2A7 survival associations across molecular data types. CYP2A7 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (13), followed by mutation status (3). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
CYP2A7 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier13DLBC (63)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier3LUAD (36)view →
This table ranks reproducible CYP2A7 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High CYP2A7 expression shows unfavorable associations in DLBC, THCA and KIRC, but favorable associations in LIHC, HNSC and BRCA. The DLBC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p = .001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify DLBC as the clearest survival context for CYP2A7 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
DLBCOSTertileIV0.2130.931.00163view →
LIHCOSQuartileIII,IV0.6970.345.00148view →
THCAOSQuartileAll0.9591.000.00326view →
KIRCDFSMedianIII,IV0.3460.580.00222view →
HNSCDFSTertileII,III,IV0.7560.648.01920view →
BRCADFSQuartileIII,IV0.9300.839.01312view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 13 lineages →

CYP2A7-DLBC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CYP2A7 RNA expression in DLBC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes CYP2A7 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 5. The strongest signals are observed in LIHC for RNA.
CYP2A7 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot5LIHC (8)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for CYP2A7. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. CYP2A7 shows lower tumor expression in LIHC, CHOL, LUSC, UCEC and LUAD. The LIHC box plot shows higher CYP2A7 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −3.593, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
LIHCMaleII,III,IV−3.593<.0018view →
CHOLFemaleAll−7.246<.0015view →
LUSCMaleAll−0.166<.0014view →
UCECAllAll−0.228.0132view →
LUADFemaleAll−0.122.0391view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 5 lineages →

CYP2A7-LIHC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for CYP2A7 in LIHC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with CYP2A7 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, CYP2A7 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, CYP2A7 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in BLOOD_Lymphoma, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT and LARGE_INTESTINE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA15,451THYM (7163)view →
Function (RNA)7,087STAD (4657)view →
Mutation
RNA659UCEC (294)view →
Protein (RPPA)12UCEC (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)137BRCA (137)view →
RNA93BRCA (93)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
RNA2,247BLOOD_Lymphoma (1099)view →
CRISPR2,046BLOOD_Lymphoma (189)view →
RNA
RNA3,697BLOOD_Lymphoma (1021)view →
Function (RNA)1,105UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT (231)view →
Mutation
Mutation3,161LARGE_INTESTINE (2084)view →
RNA25URINARY_TRACT (9)view →
shRNA
RNA2,853SOFT_TISSUE (815)view →
shRNA2,111SOFT_TISSUE (370)view →