CPEB4

associated omics data
cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 4Genealiases: CPE-BP4 · hCPEB-4

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored CPEB4 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. CPEB4 expression is associated with patient survival in 22 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, CPEB4 is differentially expressed in 10, with the highest sampling consensus in THCA. Additionally, CPEB4 RNA expression shows 20,242 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight KIRC, THCA, and THYM as cancer lineages where CPEB4 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes CPEB4 survival associations across molecular data types. CPEB4 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (22), followed by mutation status (6) and mass-spec protein abundance (3). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
CPEB4 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier22KIRC (194)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier6HNSC (48)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier3UCEC (12)view →
This table ranks reproducible CPEB4 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High CPEB4 expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM and BLCA, but favorable associations in KIRC, SKCM, ACC and BRCA. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for CPEB4 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCOSMedianAll0.7610.512<.001194view →
UVMDFSQuartileII,III,IV0.2650.807<.00172view →
SKCMOSTertileIII,IV0.4710.287<.00157view →
ACCOSTertileII,III,IV0.8960.599.00246view →
BLCADFSMedianAll0.1550.516.00326view →
BRCADFSTertileIII,IV0.9340.787<.00126view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 22 lineages →

CPEB4-KIRC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CPEB4 RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes CPEB4 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 10, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 4. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
CPEB4 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot10THCA (10)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot4CCRCC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for CPEB4. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. CPEB4 shows lower tumor expression in THCA, KIRC, LUSC, HNSC, BLCA and COAD. The THCA box plot shows higher CPEB4 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −1.501, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
THCAMaleIII,IV−1.501<.00110view →
KIRCMaleII,III,IV−0.806<.0019view →
LUSCFemaleII,III,IV−1.724<.0018view →
HNSCMaleIII,IV−0.998<.0018view →
BLCAAllAll−0.954<.0018view →
COADFemaleAll−0.815<.0017view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 10 lineages →

CPEB4-THCA

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for CPEB4 in THCA.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with CPEB4 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, CPEB4 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, CPEB4 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in OVARY, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in CNS and BONE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA20,242THYM (9055)view →
Protein (mass-spec)14,439LSCC (5911)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)14,636LSCC (5032)view →
RNA13,561LSCC (8593)view →
Mutation
RNA3,647UCEC (3429)view →
Protein (RPPA)41UCEC (41)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,736OVARY (166)view →
RNA1,265OVARY (331)view →
RNA
RNA11,715CNS (2941)view →
Function (RNA)5,221BONE (1653)view →
Mutation
Mutation1,807LARGE_INTESTINE (665)view →
RNA12BLOOD_Leukemia (4)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,752BLOOD_Myeloma (293)view →
RNA1,409KIDNEY (304)view →