CHD1

associated omics data
chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 1Genealiases: CHD-1 · PILBOS

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored CHD1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. CHD1 expression is associated with patient survival in 26 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, CHD1 is differentially expressed in 10, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, CHD1 protein abundance shows 24,229 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in GBM. Together, these results highlight KIRP, KIRC, and GBM as cancer lineages where CHD1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes CHD1 survival associations across molecular data types. CHD1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (26), followed by mutation status (4) and mass-spec protein abundance (5). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
CHD1 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier26KIRP (109)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier5PDAC (45)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier4UCEC (28)view →
This table ranks reproducible CHD1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High CHD1 expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRP, LGG, UVM and MESO, but favorable associations in BRCA and KIRC. The KIRP Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRP as the clearest survival context for CHD1 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRPDFSTertileAll0.7820.939<.001109view →
LGGOSMedianAll0.7360.881<.00152view →
BRCADFSMedianIII,IV0.9330.816<.00151view →
UVMDFSQuartileIII,IV0.1820.823.00247view →
KIRCDFSMedianAll0.8780.710.00144view →
MESOOSMedianIII,IV0.2800.490.00342view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 26 lineages →

CHD1-KIRP (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CHD1 RNA expression in KIRP: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes CHD1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 10, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 6. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
CHD1 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot10KIRC (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot6CCRCC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for CHD1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. CHD1 shows higher tumor expression in KIRC, STAD, HNSC, CHOL, BRCA and KIRP. The KIRC box plot shows higher CHD1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.667, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCFemaleAll+0.667<.00111view →
STADAllII,III,IV+0.730.0018view →
HNSCMaleAll+0.593<.0018view →
CHOLMaleAll+1.166<.0015view →
BRCAAllII,III,IV+0.259.0164view →
KIRPAllIV+0.957.0183view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 10 lineages →

CHD1-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for CHD1 in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with CHD1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, CHD1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with GBM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, CHD1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in OVARY, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LIVER and BLOOD_Leukemia.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)24,229GBM (10132)view →
RNA12,493LSCC (5905)view →
RNA
RNA21,294KIRP (9096)view →
Protein (mass-spec)13,483GBM (5361)view →
Mutation
RNA4,619UCEC (3926)view →
Protein (RPPA)69UCEC (48)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
RNA2,740OVARY (507)view →
CRISPR2,106LIVER (182)view →
RNA
RNA9,728BLOOD_Leukemia (4284)view →
Function (RNA)3,853BLOOD_Leukemia (1424)view →
Mutation
Mutation5,512LARGE_INTESTINE (4025)view →
RNA2,109LARGE_INTESTINE (2077)view →
shRNA
RNA2,674LUNG_SCLC (833)view →
shRNA2,080LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (343)view →