ATXN7L3

associated omics data
ataxin 7 like 3Genealiases: HATONS · SGF11

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored ATXN7L3 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. ATXN7L3 expression is associated with patient survival in 23 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, ATXN7L3 is differentially expressed in 14, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Additionally, ATXN7L3 protein abundance shows 32,221 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LSCC. Together, these results highlight ACC, HNSC, and LSCC as cancer lineages where ATXN7L3 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes ATXN7L3 survival associations across molecular data types. ATXN7L3 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (23), followed by mutation status (7) and mass-spec protein abundance (11). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
ATXN7L3 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier23ACC (99)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier11HNSC (38)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier7BRCA (36)view →
This table ranks reproducible ATXN7L3 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High ATXN7L3 expression shows unfavorable associations in ACC, LIHC, KIRP, UVM and CESC, but favorable associations in BRCA. The ACC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify ACC as the clearest survival context for ATXN7L3 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
ACCDFSMedianAll0.3310.789<.00199view →
LIHCOSMedianAll0.6990.855<.00186view →
KIRPDFSQuartileII,III,IV0.0981.000.00179view →
UVMDFSTertileII,III,IV0.4530.807<.00157view →
CESCDFSQuartileAll0.7600.903.00146view →
BRCAOSMedianIII,IV0.9460.853<.00139view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 23 lineages →

ATXN7L3-ACC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for ATXN7L3 RNA expression in ACC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes ATXN7L3 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 14, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 7. The strongest signals are observed in HNSC for RNA and LSCC for protein.
ATXN7L3 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot14HNSC (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot7LSCC (8)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for ATXN7L3. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. ATXN7L3 shows lower tumor expression in KICH and higher tumor expression in HNSC, LIHC, LUAD, LUSC and STAD. The HNSC box plot shows higher ATXN7L3 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.868, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
HNSCMaleAll+0.868<.00111view →
LIHCFemaleII,III,IV+1.439<.0019view →
LUADMaleIII,IV+0.986<.0019view →
KICHMaleAll−1.145<.0018view →
LUSCFemaleAll+1.067<.0018view →
STADMaleII,III,IV+0.947<.0018view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 14 lineages →

ATXN7L3-HNSC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for ATXN7L3 in HNSC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with ATXN7L3 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, ATXN7L3 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LSCC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, ATXN7L3 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in BLOOD_Leukemia, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT and BLOOD_Lymphoma.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)32,221LSCC (11024)view →
RNA12,687HNSC (3818)view →
RNA
RNA19,897ACC (9633)view →
Protein (mass-spec)15,653LSCC (6353)view →
Mutation
RNA6,106UCEC (6022)view →
Protein (RPPA)18UCEC (18)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,876BLOOD_Leukemia (152)view →
RNA1,827BLOOD_Leukemia (406)view →
RNA
RNA11,588UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT (6224)view →
Function (RNA)3,877BLOOD_Leukemia (1239)view →
Mutation
Mutation796BLOOD_Lymphoma (517)view →
RNA2BLOOD_Lymphoma (2)view →