Q-omics provides the consensus-scored ARG1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. ARG1 expression is associated with patient survival in 16 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, ARG1 is differentially expressed in 12, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, ARG1 protein abundance shows 35,999 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LSCC. Together, these results highlight ACC, KIRC, and LSCC as cancer lineages where ARG1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for ARG1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes ARG1 survival associations across molecular data types. ARG1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (16), followed by mutation status (4) and mass-spec protein abundance (11). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible ARG1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High ARG1 expression shows unfavorable associations in ACC, OV, DLBC and KIRP, but favorable associations in READ and HNSC. The ACC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify ACC as the clearest survival context for ARG1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes ARG1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 12, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 11. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for ARG1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. ARG1 shows lower tumor expression in THCA, LIHC, BRCA, UCEC and CHOL and higher tumor expression in KIRC. The KIRC box plot shows higher ARG1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.102, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with ARG1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, ARG1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LSCC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, ARG1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in CNS, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in SKIN and BONE.
