Anatomical structure arrangement

associated omics data
GO:0048532Ontology (GO BP)GO biological process · ~16 member genes

Q-omics provides the Anatomical structure arrangement (GO:0048532) pathway profile, scoring each patient from the combined activity of its roughly 16 member genes. Pathway activity is associated with patient survival in 24 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in LUAD. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, the pathway is differentially active in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Additionally, pathway RNA activity shows 35,158 significant cross-omics associations, again with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight LUAD, HNSC, and STAD as cancer lineages where the pathway shows reproducible signals across outcome, tissue activity, and molecular association analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns. Pathway-against-pathway and pathway-against-mutation comparisons are not available for ontology entities.

Survival associations

This table summarizes Anatomical structure arrangement survival associations by molecular data type. RNA-level pathway activity shows survival associations in the most cancer types (24). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each layer.
Data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
GO function (RNA)Kaplan–Meier24LUAD (76)view →
GO function (Protein (mass-spec))Kaplan–Meier5UCEC (42)view →
This table ranks reproducible pathway activity–survival associations across cancer types. High Anatomical structure arrangement activity shows favorable associations in KIRC, UCS and THCA, but unfavorable associations in LUAD, READ and KIRP. In the LUAD Kaplan–Meier curve the high-activity group declines faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). LUAD ranks highest by sampling consensus for Anatomical structure arrangement.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
LUADOSTertileAll0.5860.757<.00176view →
KIRCDFSMedianAll0.9090.833<.00159view →
UCSDFSMedianIV0.9520.367.00142view →
THCADFSMedianII,III,IV0.9670.768<.00142view →
READOSQuartileAll0.6310.922.00334view →
KIRPOSTertileII,III,IV0.2420.776.00232view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 24 lineages →

Anatomical structure arrangement-LUAD (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for Anatomical structure arrangement pathway activity in LUAD: high vs low activity groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal activity

This table summarizes Anatomical structure arrangement tumor–normal activity differences by data type. RNA-level activity shows significant tumor–normal differences in 11 cancer types, while mass-spec protein activity shows differences in 4. The strongest signals are in HNSC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
Data typeActivity analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
GO function (RNA)Box plot11HNSC (10)view →
GO function (Protein (mass-spec))Box plot4CCRCC (10)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal activity differences for the pathway. A positive fold-change indicates higher activity in tumor tissue. The pathway shows higher tumor activity across HNSC, KIRC, THCA, STAD and LUSC and lower tumor activity in BRCA. In the HNSC box plot, tumor samples show higher pathway activity than matched normal samples (log2 FC = +0.078, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
HNSCMaleIV+0.078<.00110view →
KIRCFemaleAll+0.052<.0019view →
BRCAAllIII,IV−0.084<.0018view →
THCAAllAll+0.048<.0017view →
STADMaleII,III,IV+0.085<.0015view →
LUSCMaleII,III,IV+0.049.0064view →
Pink = higher activity in tumor. all 11 lineages →

Anatomical structure arrangement-HNSC

Tumor-vs-normal pathway-activity box plot for Anatomical structure arrangement in HNSC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with Anatomical structure arrangement pathway activity in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, pathway activity is most strongly linked to RNA and protein features, with the largest associated set in STAD. In cancer cell lines, RNA-expression features and functional dependencies dominate, with the largest set in LARGE_INTESTINE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA35,158STAD (17873)view →
Protein (mass-spec)9,131LUAD (2309)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)18,041GBM (6934)view →
RNA2,424GBM (715)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,995LARGE_INTESTINE (167)view →
RNA1,867SOFT_TISSUE (276)view →
RNA
RNA4,158UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT (748)view →
CRISPR2,101PANCREAS (194)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,743BLOOD_Myeloma (292)view →
CRISPR1,351SOFT_TISSUE (169)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
RNA1,462LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (329)view →
shRNA709BREAST (95)view →