SPAM1

associated omics data
sperm adhesion molecule 1Genealiases: HEL-S-96n · HYA1 · HYAL5 · PH-20 · PH20 · SPAG15

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored SPAM1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. SPAM1 expression is associated with patient survival in 17 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, SPAM1 is differentially expressed in 5, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Additionally, SPAM1 RNA expression shows 5,857 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight KIRC, KIRP, and STAD as cancer lineages where SPAM1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes SPAM1 survival associations across molecular data types. SPAM1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (17), followed by mutation status (7). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
SPAM1 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier17KIRC (130)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier7UCEC (36)view →
This table ranks reproducible SPAM1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High SPAM1 expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, ACC, MESO, LUSC, KICH and LGG. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for SPAM1 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCOSTertileAll0.5110.677<.001130view →
ACCOSTertileAll0.6120.897.00172view →
MESOOSTertileAll0.0520.528.01654view →
LUSCOSTertileIII,IV0.0540.768<.00154view →
KICHDFSQuartileII,III,IV0.5310.916.00247view →
LGGDFSTertileAll0.2210.420<.00130view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 17 lineages →

SPAM1-KIRC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for SPAM1 RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes SPAM1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 5. The strongest signals are observed in KIRP for RNA.
SPAM1 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot5KIRP (6)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for SPAM1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. SPAM1 shows lower tumor expression in KIRP, COAD, THCA and KIRC and higher tumor expression in LIHC. The KIRP box plot shows higher SPAM1 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.037, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRPAllIV−0.037<.0016view →
COADMaleII,III,IV−0.011.0242view →
THCAAllAll−0.006.0292view →
KIRCAllAll−0.005.0122view →
LIHCAllAll+0.003.0431view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 5 lineages →

SPAM1-KIRP

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for SPAM1 in KIRP.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with SPAM1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, SPAM1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, SPAM1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in CNS, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in SOFT_TISSUE and OVARY.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
Function (RNA)5,857STAD (5066)view →
RNA2,734TGCT (740)view →
Mutation
RNA3,822UCEC (2879)view →
Protein (RPPA)78UCEC (56)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,762CNS (154)view →
shRNA1,138SOFT_TISSUE (111)view →
Mutation
Mutation1,103OVARY (632)view →
RNA18OVARY (7)view →
RNA
RNA874UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT (402)view →
Mutation44BLOOD_Leukemia (14)view →