PRSS8

associated omics data
serine protease 8Genealiases: CAP1 · PROSTASIN

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored PRSS8 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. PRSS8 expression is associated with patient survival in 20 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, PRSS8 is differentially expressed in 13, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, PRSS8 RNA expression shows 14,571 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in TGCT. Together, these results highlight KIRC, and TGCT as cancer lineages where PRSS8 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes PRSS8 survival associations across molecular data types. PRSS8 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (20), followed by mutation status (3) and mass-spec protein abundance (2). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
PRSS8 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier20KIRC (80)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier3LIHC (6)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier2PDAC (68)view →
This table ranks reproducible PRSS8 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High PRSS8 expression shows unfavorable associations in BLCA, SKCM and LGG, but favorable associations in KIRC, UVM and HNSC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for PRSS8 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCOSMedianAll0.7240.542<.00180view →
BLCAOSMedianIII,IV0.3150.582.00258view →
UVMOSTertileAll0.9780.620.00347view →
HNSCOSMedianAll0.7920.617.00142view →
SKCMOSTertileAll0.6940.826.00238view →
LGGDFSMedianAll0.6260.807<.00134view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 20 lineages →

PRSS8-KIRC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for PRSS8 RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes PRSS8 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 13, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 6. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and PDAC for protein.
PRSS8 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot13KIRC (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot6PDAC (9)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for PRSS8. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. PRSS8 shows lower tumor expression in KIRC, COAD and LIHC and higher tumor expression in BLCA, UCEC and BRCA. The KIRC box plot shows higher PRSS8 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −2.214, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCMaleII,III,IV−2.214<.00111view →
BLCAMaleAll+3.356<.00110view →
COADFemaleII,III,IV−0.986<.0019view →
UCECAllAll+4.386<.0016view →
LIHCMaleII,III,IV−2.429<.0016view →
BRCAAllIII,IV+2.303<.0016view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 13 lineages →

PRSS8-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for PRSS8 in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with PRSS8 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, PRSS8 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with TGCT recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, PRSS8 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in PANCREAS and BLOOD_Lymphoma.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA14,571TGCT (5879)view →
Protein (mass-spec)12,579HNSC (3255)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)13,005HNSC (3490)view →
RNA9,175HNSC (1965)view →
Mutation
RNA3,409UCEC (3350)view →
Protein (RPPA)13UCEC (13)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR2,015LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (165)view →
RNA1,930PANCREAS (342)view →
RNA
RNA10,304BLOOD_Lymphoma (2933)view →
Function (RNA)4,687LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (1147)view →
Mutation
Mutation3,573BLOOD_Leukemia (2133)view →
RNA5LARGE_INTESTINE (5)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,517LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (170)view →
CRISPR1,394BREAST (134)view →