LRATD1

associated omics data
LRAT domain containing 1Genealiases: FAM84A · NSE1 · PP11517

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored LRATD1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. LRATD1 expression is associated with patient survival in 21 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, LRATD1 is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in THCA. Additionally, LRATD1 RNA expression shows 17,972 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Together, these results highlight UVM, THCA, and KIRP as cancer lineages where LRATD1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes LRATD1 survival associations across molecular data types. LRATD1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (21), followed by mutation status (7) and mass-spec protein abundance (2). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
LRATD1 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier21UVM (94)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier7BLCA (24)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier2COAD (6)view →
This table ranks reproducible LRATD1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High LRATD1 expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, KIRP, SKCM and LGG, but favorable associations in LUSC and KIRC. The UVM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UVM as the clearest survival context for LRATD1 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UVMDFSTertileAll0.3910.988<.00194view →
KIRPDFSTertileAll0.7570.924<.00178view →
LUSCDFSQuartileAll0.8230.686.00162view →
SKCMDFSMedianII,III,IV0.1870.443.00159view →
KIRCOSQuartileAll0.8690.743<.00149view →
LGGOSTertileAll0.7400.880<.00126view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 21 lineages →

LRATD1-UVM (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for LRATD1 RNA expression in UVM: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes LRATD1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 5. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA and LSCC for protein.
LRATD1 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot11THCA (10)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot5LSCC (7)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for LRATD1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. LRATD1 shows lower tumor expression in KICH and higher tumor expression in THCA, LUSC, UCEC, COAD and KIRP. The THCA box plot shows higher LRATD1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +2.040, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
THCAFemaleAll+2.040<.00110view →
LUSCFemaleAll+2.439<.0017view →
UCECAllAll+1.965<.0016view →
KICHAllIII,IV−1.941<.0016view →
COADAllAll+0.603<.0015view →
KIRPAllIII,IV+1.130.0204view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 11 lineages →

LRATD1-THCA

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for LRATD1 in THCA.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with LRATD1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, LRATD1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with KIRP recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, LRATD1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in BLOOD_Leukemia, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in CNS and LUNG_SCLC.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA17,972KIRP (7265)view →
Protein (mass-spec)12,655LSCC (5619)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)9,857LSCC (4390)view →
RNA6,884LSCC (3931)view →
Mutation
RNA1,107UCEC (905)view →
Protein (RPPA)23UCEC (23)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
RNA2,243BLOOD_Leukemia (518)view →
CRISPR1,898CNS (142)view →
RNA
RNA9,303LUNG_SCLC (2279)view →
Function (RNA)4,518LARGE_INTESTINE (1001)view →
Mutation
Mutation1,636BLOOD_Leukemia (1128)view →
RNA13LARGE_INTESTINE (7)view →
shRNA
RNA1,344LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (271)view →
shRNA1,276LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (215)view →