Q-omics provides the consensus-scored KRTAP5-4 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. KRTAP5-4 expression is associated with patient survival in 17 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, KRTAP5-4 is differentially expressed in 7, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, KRTAP5-4 RNA expression shows 7,248 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ESCA. Together, these results highlight KIRC, COAD, and ESCA as cancer lineages where KRTAP5-4 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for KRTAP5-4 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes KRTAP5-4 survival associations across molecular data types. KRTAP5-4 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (17), followed by mutation status (3). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible KRTAP5-4 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High KRTAP5-4 expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, ACC, MESO, HNSC and DLBC, but favorable associations in READ. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for KRTAP5-4 RNA expression.
This table summarizes KRTAP5-4 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 7. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for KRTAP5-4. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. KRTAP5-4 shows lower tumor expression in KIRC and higher tumor expression in COAD, READ, KICH, STAD and LIHC. The COAD box plot shows higher KRTAP5-4 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.537, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with KRTAP5-4 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, KRTAP5-4 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ESCA recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, KRTAP5-4 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in BLOOD_Lymphoma, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BREAST and PANCREAS.
