AFAP1L1

associated omics data
actin filament associated protein 1 like 1Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored AFAP1L1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. AFAP1L1 expression is associated with patient survival in 24 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, AFAP1L1 is differentially expressed in 14, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, AFAP1L1 RNA expression shows 19,617 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Together, these results highlight ACC, and KIRC as cancer lineages where AFAP1L1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes AFAP1L1 survival associations across molecular data types. AFAP1L1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (24), followed by mutation status (6) and mass-spec protein abundance (3). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
AFAP1L1 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier24ACC (99)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier6HNSC (24)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier3LUAD (22)view →
This table ranks reproducible AFAP1L1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High AFAP1L1 expression shows unfavorable associations in ACC, STAD, LGG, MESO and KIRP, but favorable associations in KIRC. The ACC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify ACC as the clearest survival context for AFAP1L1 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
ACCDFSMedianIV0.1420.547<.00199view →
KIRCOSTertileAll0.7570.542<.00189view →
STADOSTertileAll0.2400.514<.00167view →
LGGDFSMedianAll0.7720.889<.00142view →
MESODFSQuartileAll0.2610.545.00541view →
KIRPDFSQuartileIV0.1220.794.01031view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 24 lineages →

AFAP1L1-ACC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for AFAP1L1 RNA expression in ACC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes AFAP1L1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 14, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 5. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
AFAP1L1 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot14KIRC (12)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot5CCRCC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for AFAP1L1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. AFAP1L1 shows lower tumor expression in LUAD, BRCA and UCEC and higher tumor expression in KIRC, HNSC and LIHC. The KIRC box plot shows higher AFAP1L1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.623, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCFemaleAll+1.623<.00112view →
LUADFemaleIII,IV−1.816<.00111view →
HNSCFemaleIII,IV+1.953<.00110view →
LIHCFemaleII,III,IV+1.153<.0019view →
BRCAAllIII,IV−1.069<.0018view →
UCECAllAll−2.345<.0016view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 14 lineages →

AFAP1L1-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for AFAP1L1 in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with AFAP1L1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, AFAP1L1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ACC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, AFAP1L1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BREAST and BONE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA19,617ACC (6999)view →
Protein (mass-spec)17,337CCRCC (4100)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)19,269LSCC (8138)view →
RNA13,468LSCC (5814)view →
Mutation
RNA4,609UCEC (3442)view →
Protein (RPPA)32UCEC (31)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,812LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (153)view →
RNA1,417BREAST (241)view →
RNA
RNA10,017BONE (3618)view →
Function (RNA)5,187BONE (1858)view →
Mutation
Mutation2,505LARGE_INTESTINE (2264)view →
RNA67LARGE_INTESTINE (65)view →