GLRB

associated omics data
Gene

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored GLRB profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. GLRB expression is associated with patient survival in 28 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, GLRB is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in THCA. Additionally, GLRB RNA expression shows 18,203 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight UVM, THCA, and THYM as cancer lineages where GLRB shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes GLRB survival associations across molecular data types. GLRB RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (28), followed by mutation status (3). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
GLRB data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier28UVM (92)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier3SKCM (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible GLRB RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High GLRB expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, BLCA, KICH, MESO and LUSC, but favorable associations in ACC. The UVM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UVM as the clearest survival context for GLRB RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UVMDFSQuartileII,III,IV0.4190.910<.00192view →
BLCAOSQuartileIII,IV0.4110.631.00263view →
KICHOSMedianAll0.6851.000.00356view →
ACCOSTertileAll0.9130.672.00354view →
MESOOSMedianII,III,IV0.2770.511<.00144view →
LUSCOSMedianII,III,IV0.5370.684.01637view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 28 lineages →

GLRB-UVM (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for GLRB RNA expression in UVM: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes GLRB tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA.
GLRB data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot11THCA (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for GLRB. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. GLRB shows lower tumor expression in KIRC, STAD and LUSC and higher tumor expression in THCA, KIRP and LUAD. The THCA box plot shows higher GLRB RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.401, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
THCAFemaleIII,IV+1.401<.00111view →
KIRCMaleII,III,IV−1.310<.0019view →
KIRPAllII,III,IV+1.063.0039view →
STADAllAll−0.855.0016view →
LUSCAllII,III,IV−0.651.0036view →
LUADAllAll+0.520<.0015view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 11 lineages →

GLRB-THCA

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for GLRB in THCA.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with GLRB in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, GLRB shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, GLRB RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SKIN, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BLOOD_Leukemia and BONE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA18,203THYM (8172)view →
Protein (mass-spec)17,521GBM (4531)view →
Mutation
RNA2,098UCEC (1762)view →
Protein (RPPA)50UCEC (28)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Function (mass-spec)2BRCA (2)view →
Protein (mass-spec)1BRCA (1)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,965SKIN (148)view →
RNA1,444SKIN (240)view →
RNA
RNA8,719BLOOD_Leukemia (2155)view →
Function (RNA)3,895BONE (1171)view →
Mutation
Mutation4,797LARGE_INTESTINE (4325)view →
RNA136LARGE_INTESTINE (131)view →
shRNA
CRISPR1,379OVARY (137)view →
shRNA1,337SOFT_TISSUE (166)view →