Q-omics provides the consensus-scored FMO5 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. FMO5 expression is associated with patient survival in 24 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in MESO. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, FMO5 is differentially expressed in 12, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, FMO5 RNA expression shows 20,603 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Together, these results highlight MESO, COAD, and UVM as cancer lineages where FMO5 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for FMO5 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes FMO5 survival associations across molecular data types. FMO5 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (24), followed by mutation status (7) and mass-spec protein abundance (6). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible FMO5 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High FMO5 expression shows unfavorable associations in LGG, but favorable associations in MESO, KIRC, BRCA, KIRP and ACC. The MESO Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p = .009). Together, the overview and detailed table identify MESO as the clearest survival context for FMO5 RNA expression.
This table summarizes FMO5 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 12, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 7. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for FMO5. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. FMO5 shows lower tumor expression in COAD, KIRP, KIRC, LUSC, KICH and READ. The COAD box plot shows higher FMO5 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −2.332, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with FMO5 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, FMO5 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UVM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, FMO5 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in LUNG_NSCLC_LUSC, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in SKIN and UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT.
