CREB3L3

associated omics data
cAMP responsive element binding protein 3 like 3Genealiases: CREB-H · CREBH · HYST1481 · HYTG2

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored CREB3L3 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. CREB3L3 expression is associated with patient survival in 27 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, CREB3L3 is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, CREB3L3 RNA expression shows 12,698 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ESCA. Together, these results highlight KIRC, and ESCA as cancer lineages where CREB3L3 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes CREB3L3 survival associations across molecular data types. CREB3L3 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (27), followed by mutation status (7) and mass-spec protein abundance (1). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
CREB3L3 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier27KIRC (153)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier7UCEC (22)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier1GBM (1)view →
This table ranks reproducible CREB3L3 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High CREB3L3 expression shows unfavorable associations in LUSC and MESO, but favorable associations in KIRC, ACC, HNSC and SKCM. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for CREB3L3 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCDFSQuartileII,III,IV0.8520.656<.001153view →
ACCOSMedianAll0.7930.442<.001102view →
HNSCOSMedianAll0.4500.279.00185view →
LUSCDFSMedianII,III,IV0.4870.716<.00179view →
SKCMOSMedianAll0.8520.711<.00170view →
MESODFSTertileAll0.2310.448.00166view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 27 lineages →

CREB3L3-KIRC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CREB3L3 RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes CREB3L3 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
CREB3L3 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot11KIRC (12)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for CREB3L3. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. CREB3L3 shows lower tumor expression in COAD, KIRP, READ, CHOL and KICH and higher tumor expression in KIRC. The KIRC box plot shows higher CREB3L3 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +2.921, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCMaleIII,IV+2.921<.00112view →
COADFemaleII,III,IV−2.845<.00111view →
KIRPAllIV−2.010<.0018view →
READAllAll−1.640.0016view →
CHOLFemaleAll−6.293<.0015view →
KICHAllAll−0.916<.0015view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 11 lineages →

CREB3L3-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for CREB3L3 in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with CREB3L3 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, CREB3L3 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ESCA recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, CREB3L3 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in URINARY_TRACT, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BONE and BLOOD_Leukemia.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA12,698ESCA (4307)view →
Function (RNA)7,124HNSC (3898)view →
Mutation
RNA1,356UCEC (888)view →
Protein (RPPA)16UCEC (7)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)379UCEC (357)view →
RNA320UCEC (306)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR2,036URINARY_TRACT (155)view →
RNA1,359BONE (228)view →
RNA
RNA6,124BLOOD_Leukemia (3289)view →
Function (RNA)2,164BLOOD_Leukemia (793)view →
Mutation
Mutation1,980LARGE_INTESTINE (1509)view →
RNA14SKIN (13)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,677BONE (156)view →
CRISPR1,571OESOPHAGUS (142)view →