Q-omics provides the consensus-scored BCL6 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. BCL6 expression is associated with patient survival in 25 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in SKCM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, BCL6 is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, BCL6 RNA expression shows 19,467 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Together, these results highlight SKCM, KIRC, and UVM as cancer lineages where BCL6 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for BCL6 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes BCL6 survival associations across molecular data types. BCL6 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (25), followed by mutation status (7) and mass-spec protein abundance (4). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible BCL6 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High BCL6 expression shows unfavorable associations in ACC, KIRC and OV, but favorable associations in SKCM, HNSC and UCS. The SKCM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify SKCM as the clearest survival context for BCL6 RNA expression.
This table summarizes BCL6 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 4. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA and LSCC for protein.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for BCL6. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. BCL6 shows lower tumor expression in KICH, UCEC, BRCA, THCA and LUAD and higher tumor expression in KIRC. The KIRC box plot shows higher BCL6 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.013, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with BCL6 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, BCL6 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UVM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, BCL6 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in PANCREAS, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BLOOD_Lymphoma and BLOOD_Leukemia.