ATP5F1B

associated omics data
ATP synthase F1 subunit betaGenealiases: ATP5B · ATPMB · ATPSB · DYT38 · HEL-S-271 · HUMOP2

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored ATP5F1B profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. ATP5F1B expression is associated with patient survival in 24 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, ATP5F1B is differentially expressed in 8, with the highest sampling consensus in LIHC. Additionally, ATP5F1B protein abundance shows 30,886 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in GBM. Together, these results highlight UVM, LIHC, and GBM as cancer lineages where ATP5F1B shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes ATP5F1B survival associations across molecular data types. ATP5F1B RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (24), followed by mutation status (4) and mass-spec protein abundance (6). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
ATP5F1B data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier24UVM (102)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier6HNSC (8)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier4KIRC (24)view →
This table ranks reproducible ATP5F1B RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High ATP5F1B expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, LUAD, BRCA and LIHC, but favorable associations in KIRC and KIRP. The UVM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UVM as the clearest survival context for ATP5F1B RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UVMDFSTertileAll0.3960.815<.001102view →
LUADDFSQuartileAll0.7050.842.00266view →
BRCAOSMedianII,III,IV0.5630.596.00355view →
LIHCOSMedianAll0.7000.851<.00154view →
KIRCOSMedianAll0.7250.532<.00153view →
KIRPDFSMedianAll0.9120.605.00246view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 24 lineages →

ATP5F1B-UVM (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for ATP5F1B RNA expression in UVM: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes ATP5F1B tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 8, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 5. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
ATP5F1B data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot8THCA (9)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot5CCRCC (12)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for ATP5F1B. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. ATP5F1B shows lower tumor expression in THCA, KIRC and COAD and higher tumor expression in LIHC, LUSC and UCEC. The LIHC box plot shows higher ATP5F1B RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.107, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
LIHCFemaleII,III,IV+1.107<.0019view →
THCAMaleIII,IV−0.980<.0019view →
KIRCMaleII,III,IV−0.880<.0019view →
LUSCMaleII,III,IV+0.776<.0017view →
COADMaleAll−0.500<.0016view →
UCECAllIII,IV+0.666.0114view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 8 lineages →

ATP5F1B-LIHC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for ATP5F1B in LIHC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with ATP5F1B in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, ATP5F1B shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with GBM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, ATP5F1B RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in CNS, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LARGE_INTESTINE and UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)30,886GBM (10068)view →
RNA12,647LSCC (3645)view →
RNA
RNA18,161ACC (8457)view →
Protein (mass-spec)16,942LSCC (10283)view →
Mutation
RNA447UCEC (353)view →
Protein (RPPA)5UCEC (5)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR2,328CNS (337)view →
RNA1,639LARGE_INTESTINE (255)view →
RNA
RNA10,997UPPER_AERODIGESTIVE_TRACT (3607)view →
Function (RNA)4,925BONE (1790)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
RNA3,821BREAST (1586)view →
Function (RNA)2,055BREAST (794)view →
shRNA
RNA1,958BREAST (635)view →
shRNA1,876BREAST (326)view →