SYT9

associated omics data
synaptotagmin 9Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored SYT9 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. SYT9 expression is associated with patient survival in 23 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, SYT9 is differentially expressed in 14, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Additionally, SYT9 RNA expression shows 20,917 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in GBM. Together, these results highlight KIRC, KICH, and GBM as cancer lineages where SYT9 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes SYT9 survival associations across molecular data types. SYT9 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (23), followed by mutation status (8). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
SYT9 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier23KIRC (167)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier8HNSC (21)view →
This table ranks reproducible SYT9 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High SYT9 expression shows unfavorable associations in HNSC, STAD and KIRP, but favorable associations in KIRC, BRCA and BLCA. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for SYT9 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCDFSMedianAll0.7110.553<.001167view →
BRCAOSMedianIII,IV0.8980.760.00263view →
BLCAOSQuartileII,III,IV0.6240.335.00157view →
HNSCOSTertileIV0.5210.864.00138view →
STADDFSQuartileAll0.5760.727.00831view →
KIRPDFSTertileIII,IV0.0850.638.00129view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 23 lineages →

SYT9-KIRC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for SYT9 RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes SYT9 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 14. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA.
SYT9 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot14THCA (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for SYT9. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. SYT9 shows lower tumor expression in KICH, THCA, KIRP, COAD and LIHC and higher tumor expression in BRCA. The KICH box plot shows higher SYT9 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −2.145, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KICHMaleII,III,IV−2.145<.00111view →
THCAMaleIII,IV−1.882<.00111view →
KIRPMaleAll−1.591<.00111view →
COADAllII,III,IV−0.177<.00111view →
BRCAAllIII,IV+1.327<.0016view →
LIHCFemaleII,III,IV−1.494<.0015view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 14 lineages →

SYT9-KICH

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for SYT9 in KICH.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with SYT9 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, SYT9 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with GBM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, SYT9 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in CNS, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in SOFT_TISSUE and LARGE_INTESTINE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
Protein (mass-spec)20,917GBM (11239)view →
RNA15,462TGCT (5890)view →
Mutation
RNA4,335UCEC (3250)view →
Protein (RPPA)35UCEC (28)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,794CNS (144)view →
RNA1,251SOFT_TISSUE (220)view →
shRNA
shRNA2,972CNS (628)view →
RNA1,707SOFT_TISSUE (248)view →
Mutation
Mutation1,868LARGE_INTESTINE (1229)view →
RNA6SKIN (3)view →
RNA
RNA1,389BLOOD_Myeloma (396)view →
Function (RNA)427BLOOD_Myeloma (117)view →