NRG3

associated omics data
neuregulin 3Genealiases: HRG3 · pro-NRG3

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored NRG3 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. NRG3 expression is associated with patient survival in 23 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in BLCA. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, NRG3 is differentially expressed in 16, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, NRG3 RNA expression shows 16,505 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Together, these results highlight BLCA, KIRC, and UVM as cancer lineages where NRG3 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes NRG3 survival associations across molecular data types. NRG3 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (23), followed by mutation status (8). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
NRG3 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier23BLCA (130)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier8UCEC (36)view →
This table ranks reproducible NRG3 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High NRG3 expression shows unfavorable associations in BLCA, STAD and UCEC, but favorable associations in HNSC, LGG and KIRC. The BLCA Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify BLCA as the clearest survival context for NRG3 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
BLCAOSQuartileAll0.4770.670<.001130view →
HNSCDFSMedianAll0.7580.643<.00174view →
STADOSMedianAll0.3110.528.00766view →
LGGOSMedianAll0.8810.739<.00154view →
KIRCDFSTertileAll0.7880.530<.00153view →
UCECDFSMedianAll0.7840.889<.00150view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 23 lineages →

NRG3-BLCA (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for NRG3 RNA expression in BLCA: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes NRG3 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 16. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
NRG3 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot16KIRC (12)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for NRG3. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. NRG3 shows lower tumor expression in COAD, LUAD, LUSC and THCA and higher tumor expression in KIRC and KIRP. The KIRC box plot shows higher NRG3 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.416, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCFemaleAll+1.416<.00112view →
COADMaleII,III,IV−0.170<.00111view →
LUADFemaleIII,IV−1.177<.0019view →
LUSCMaleII,III,IV−0.780<.0018view →
KIRPAllAll+0.791<.0017view →
THCAMaleII,III,IV−0.466<.0017view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 16 lineages →

NRG3-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for NRG3 in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with NRG3 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, NRG3 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UVM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, NRG3 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SOFT_TISSUE, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LARGE_INTESTINE and SKIN.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA16,505UVM (7082)view →
Protein (mass-spec)12,650GBM (8109)view →
Mutation
RNA7,684UCEC (5058)view →
Protein (RPPA)74UCEC (45)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,474SOFT_TISSUE (135)view →
RNA1,155SOFT_TISSUE (194)view →
Mutation
Mutation6,213LARGE_INTESTINE (4583)view →
RNA535LARGE_INTESTINE (464)view →
RNA
RNA4,101SKIN (1512)view →
Function (RNA)1,849SKIN (946)view →
shRNA
shRNA988LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD (211)view →
CRISPR801OESOPHAGUS (106)view →