HLA-Z

associated omics data
major histocompatibility complex, class I, Z (pseudogene)Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored HLA-Z profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. HLA-Z expression is associated with patient survival in 17 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in CESC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, HLA-Z is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in BRCA. Additionally, HLA-Z RNA expression shows 13,004 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in DLBC. Together, these results highlight CESC, BRCA, and DLBC as cancer lineages where HLA-Z shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes HLA-Z survival associations across molecular data types. HLA-Z RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (17). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
HLA-Z data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier17CESC (62)view →
This table ranks reproducible HLA-Z RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High HLA-Z expression shows unfavorable associations in CESC, BLCA, UVM, COAD, THCA and OV. The CESC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify CESC as the clearest survival context for HLA-Z RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
CESCDFSMedianAll0.6390.805<.00162view →
BLCADFSTertileAll0.4340.625.02045view →
UVMDFSTertileAll0.2470.803<.00145view →
COADDFSQuartileIII,IV0.5020.751.00535view →
THCADFSQuartileII,III,IV0.8580.916.01435view →
OVOSTertileIII,IV0.6030.700.03424view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 17 lineages →

HLA-Z-CESC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for HLA-Z RNA expression in CESC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes HLA-Z tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11. The strongest signals are observed in BRCA for RNA.
HLA-Z data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot11BRCA (6)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for HLA-Z. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. HLA-Z shows higher tumor expression in BRCA, STAD, LUAD, KIRC, BLCA and ESCA. The BRCA box plot shows higher HLA-Z RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.322, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
BRCAAllII,III,IV+0.322<.0016view →
STADAllII,III,IV+0.424.0185view →
LUADAllAll+0.491<.0014view →
KIRCAllII,III,IV+0.215.0164view →
BLCAAllAll+0.366.0143view →
ESCAAllII,III,IV+1.390.0112view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 11 lineages →

HLA-Z-BRCA

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for HLA-Z in BRCA.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with HLA-Z in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, HLA-Z shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with DLBC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA13,004DLBC (6602)view →
Function (RNA)6,883KIRC (4255)view →