DBNDD1

associated omics data
dysbindin domain containing 1Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored DBNDD1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. DBNDD1 expression is associated with patient survival in 23 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, DBNDD1 is differentially expressed in 15, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, DBNDD1 RNA expression shows 16,326 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in TGCT. Together, these results highlight KICH, COAD, and TGCT as cancer lineages where DBNDD1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes DBNDD1 survival associations across molecular data types. DBNDD1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (23), followed by mutation status (2) and mass-spec protein abundance (2). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
DBNDD1 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier23KICH (98)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier2THYM (42)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier2LSCC (5)view →
This table ranks reproducible DBNDD1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High DBNDD1 expression shows unfavorable associations in BLCA, ACC and LGG, but favorable associations in KICH, KIRP and HNSC. The KICH Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p = .001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KICH as the clearest survival context for DBNDD1 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KICHDFSQuartileIII,IV1.0000.031.00198view →
KIRPOSMedianAll0.9790.881<.00186view →
HNSCOSQuartileIV0.7930.575<.00173view →
BLCADFSTertileAll0.1950.510.00167view →
ACCDFSQuartileAll0.2270.861<.00151view →
LGGOSMedianAll0.7180.891<.00146view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 23 lineages →

DBNDD1-KICH (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for DBNDD1 RNA expression in KICH: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes DBNDD1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 15, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 3. The strongest signals are observed in LUAD for RNA and LUAD for protein.
DBNDD1 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot15LUAD (11)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Box plot3LUAD (4)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for DBNDD1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. DBNDD1 shows lower tumor expression in HNSC and higher tumor expression in COAD, LUAD, KIRP, LIHC and BRCA. The COAD box plot shows higher DBNDD1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +2.302, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
COADAllIII,IV+2.302<.00111view →
LUADFemaleIII,IV+2.264<.00111view →
KIRPAllII,III,IV+1.611<.00111view →
HNSCFemaleIV−2.083<.00110view →
LIHCFemaleAll+2.062<.0018view →
BRCAAllIII,IV+1.548<.0018view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 15 lineages →

DBNDD1-COAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for DBNDD1 in COAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with DBNDD1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, DBNDD1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with TGCT recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, DBNDD1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in BONE, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LARGE_INTESTINE and LUNG_SCLC.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA16,326TGCT (5644)view →
Protein (mass-spec)13,596LUAD (5149)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)9,126GBM (3464)view →
RNA2,947LUAD (1442)view →
Mutation
RNA1,082UCEC (1046)view →
Protein (RPPA)34UCEC (34)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
RNA2,106BONE (694)view →
CRISPR2,062BONE (176)view →
RNA
RNA9,519LARGE_INTESTINE (3531)view →
Function (RNA)3,800LUNG_SCLC (742)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,933BLOOD_Leukemia (322)view →
CRISPR1,296CNS (111)view →
Mutation
Mutation60LARGE_INTESTINE (44)view →
RNA1LARGE_INTESTINE (1)view →