RORA-AS2

associated omics data
RORA antisense RNA 2Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RORA-AS2 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RORA-AS2 expression is associated with patient survival in 16 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in DLBC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RORA-AS2 is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in THCA. Additionally, RORA-AS2 RNA expression shows 14,032 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in CCRCC. Together, these results highlight DLBC, THCA, and CCRCC as cancer lineages where RORA-AS2 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes RORA-AS2 survival associations across molecular data types. RORA-AS2 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (16). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
RORA-AS2 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier16DLBC (117)view →
This table ranks reproducible RORA-AS2 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RORA-AS2 expression shows unfavorable associations in DLBC, UVM, THYM and LUSC, but favorable associations in HNSC and BRCA. The DLBC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify DLBC as the clearest survival context for RORA-AS2 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
DLBCDFSTertileIV0.1250.744<.001117view →
HNSCDFSTertileIII,IV0.9460.569.00587view →
UVMDFSTertileAll0.3200.768.01672view →
THYMOSTertileIII,IV0.4381.000<.00169view →
LUSCOSTertileII,III,IV0.1520.561.00442view →
BRCAOSTertileIII,IV0.7000.464.00736view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 16 lineages →

RORA-AS2-DLBC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for RORA-AS2 RNA expression in DLBC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes RORA-AS2 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA.
RORA-AS2 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot2THCA (4)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RORA-AS2. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RORA-AS2 shows lower tumor expression in THCA and LIHC and higher tumor expression in LIHC. The THCA box plot shows higher RORA-AS2 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.060, t-test p = .001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
THCAAllAll−0.060.0014view →
LIHCMaleAll+0.041.0171view →
LIHCFemaleII,III,IV−0.030.0361view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 2 lineages →

RORA-AS2-THCA

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for RORA-AS2 in THCA.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with RORA-AS2 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RORA-AS2 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with CCRCC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
Protein (mass-spec)14,032CCRCC (4644)view →
Function (RNA)6,462STAD (5715)view →