MT-TR

associated omics data
Gene

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored MT-TR profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. MT-TR expression is associated with patient survival in 18 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, MT-TR is differentially expressed in 7, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, MT-TR RNA expression shows 5,416 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LAML. Together, these results highlight UVM, KIRC, and LAML as cancer lineages where MT-TR shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes MT-TR survival associations across molecular data types. MT-TR RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (18). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
MT-TR data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier18UVM (115)view →
This table ranks reproducible MT-TR RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High MT-TR expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, KIRC, MESO, UCEC and LIHC, but favorable associations in THCA. The UVM Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UVM as the clearest survival context for MT-TR RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UVMDFSMedianAll0.5730.920<.001115view →
KIRCDFSTertileAll0.4870.680.00263view →
MESOOSTertileAll0.2580.454.00150view →
UCECOSTertileII,III,IV0.7790.883.00542view →
LIHCDFSTertileAll0.4570.594.00927view →
THCAOSMedianII,III,IV1.0000.809.00625view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 18 lineages →

MT-TR-UVM (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for MT-TR RNA expression in UVM: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes MT-TR tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 7. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
MT-TR data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot7KIRC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for MT-TR. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. MT-TR shows lower tumor expression in KIRC, HNSC, BRCA, KIRP and KICH and higher tumor expression in COAD. The KIRC box plot shows higher MT-TR RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.349, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCAllII,III,IV−0.349<.00111view →
HNSCMaleII,III,IV−0.271.0055view →
BRCAFemaleAll−0.269.0014view →
KIRPAllIV−1.290.0032view →
COADFemaleAll+0.403.0472view →
KICHAllIII,IV−0.807.0301view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 7 lineages →

MT-TR-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for MT-TR in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with MT-TR in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, MT-TR shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LAML recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA5,416LAML (1404)view →
Function (RNA)5,039LGG (1150)view →