MT-TN

associated omics data
Gene

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored MT-TN profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. MT-TN expression is associated with patient survival in 12 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, MT-TN is differentially expressed in 4, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, MT-TN RNA expression shows 6,814 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Together, these results highlight KIRC, and COAD as cancer lineages where MT-TN shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes MT-TN survival associations across molecular data types. MT-TN RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (12). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
MT-TN data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier12KIRC (60)view →
This table ranks reproducible MT-TN RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High MT-TN expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, READ, UVM, ACC and BLCA, but favorable associations in LGG. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for MT-TN RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCDFSTertileIII,IV0.1110.755<.00160view →
READOSTertileIII,IV0.2890.932<.00157view →
UVMOSTertileIII,IV0.1780.933<.00127view →
LGGDFSTertileAll0.9030.811.00921view →
ACCDFSTertileIII,IV0.0460.670.00118view →
BLCAOSTertileIV0.2300.611.00118view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 12 lineages →

MT-TN-KIRC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for MT-TN RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes MT-TN tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 4. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA.
MT-TN data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot4COAD (4)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for MT-TN. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. MT-TN shows lower tumor expression in COAD, HNSC and LIHC and higher tumor expression in KICH. The COAD box plot shows higher MT-TN RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.288, t-test p = .012).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
COADFemaleAll−0.288.0124view →
HNSCAllII,III,IV−0.196.0172view →
KICHAllAll+0.296.0141view →
LIHCMaleAll−0.193.0151view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 4 lineages →

MT-TN-COAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for MT-TN in COAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with MT-TN in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, MT-TN shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with KIRC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA6,814KIRC (2770)view →
Function (RNA)3,680OV (1251)view →