MT-TA

associated omics data
Gene

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored MT-TA profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. MT-TA expression is associated with patient survival in 16 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, MT-TA is differentially expressed in 4, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, MT-TA RNA expression shows 7,840 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Together, these results highlight HNSC, COAD, and ACC as cancer lineages where MT-TA shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes MT-TA survival associations across molecular data types. MT-TA RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (16). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
MT-TA data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier16HNSC (51)view →
This table ranks reproducible MT-TA RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High MT-TA expression shows unfavorable associations in HNSC, DLBC, THYM and LUSC, but favorable associations in KICH and LGG. The HNSC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p = .020). Together, the overview and detailed table identify HNSC as the clearest survival context for MT-TA RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
HNSCOSTertileAll0.5100.667.02051view →
DLBCOSTertileAll0.2020.911.00737view →
THYMOSTertileAll0.1860.930.00336view →
LUSCOSTertileIV0.0010.673.01436view →
KICHDFSTertileIII,IV1.0000.406.00624view →
LGGDFSTertileAll0.9330.790.00521view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 16 lineages →

MT-TA-HNSC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for MT-TA RNA expression in HNSC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes MT-TA tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 4. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA.
MT-TA data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot4COAD (5)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for MT-TA. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. MT-TA shows lower tumor expression in COAD, ESCA and LUAD and higher tumor expression in KICH. The COAD box plot shows higher MT-TA RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.245, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
COADAllAll−0.245<.0015view →
ESCAAllII,III,IV−1.255<.0013view →
KICHAllAll+0.353.0111view →
LUADAllII,III,IV−0.160.0491view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 4 lineages →

MT-TA-COAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for MT-TA in COAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with MT-TA in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, MT-TA shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ACC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA7,840ACC (3492)view →
Function (RNA)4,667OV (2694)view →