IGHD4-4

associated omics data
immunoglobulin heavy diversity 4-4Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored IGHD4-4 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. IGHD4-4 expression is associated with patient survival in 8 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in DLBC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, IGHD4-4 is differentially expressed in 4, with the highest sampling consensus in COAD. Additionally, IGHD4-4 RNA expression shows 8,169 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LAML. Together, these results highlight DLBC, COAD, and LAML as cancer lineages where IGHD4-4 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes IGHD4-4 survival associations across molecular data types. IGHD4-4 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (8). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
IGHD4-4 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier8DLBC (78)view →
This table ranks reproducible IGHD4-4 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High IGHD4-4 expression shows unfavorable associations in DLBC and STAD, but favorable associations in HNSC, SKCM, ESCA and LUAD. The DLBC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify DLBC as the clearest survival context for IGHD4-4 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
DLBCOSTertileAll0.0560.888<.00178view →
HNSCDFSTertileAll0.7750.586.00751view →
SKCMDFSTertileAll0.3680.185.00345view →
ESCADFSTertileII,III,IV0.6200.319.02142view →
STADDFSQuartileII,III,IV0.3920.564.02229view →
LUADDFSTertileAll0.7520.637.01527view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 8 lineages →

IGHD4-4-DLBC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for IGHD4-4 RNA expression in DLBC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes IGHD4-4 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 4. The strongest signals are observed in COAD for RNA.
IGHD4-4 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot4COAD (5)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for IGHD4-4. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. IGHD4-4 shows lower tumor expression in COAD and higher tumor expression in LUAD, KIRC and ESCA. The COAD box plot shows higher IGHD4-4 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.961, t-test p = .003).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
COADFemaleII,III,IV−0.961.0035view →
LUADAllAll+0.577.0054view →
KIRCAllAll+0.211.0074view →
ESCAAllAll+1.073.0321view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 4 lineages →

IGHD4-4-COAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for IGHD4-4 in COAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with IGHD4-4 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, IGHD4-4 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LAML recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA8,169LAML (2399)view →
Protein (mass-spec)6,832LSCC (4259)view →