endogenous retrovirus group FRD member 3Genealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored ERVFRD-3 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. ERVFRD-3 expression is associated with patient survival in 22 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, ERVFRD-3 is differentially expressed in 8, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, ERVFRD-3 RNA expression shows 17,233 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight HNSC, KIRC, and THYM as cancer lineages where ERVFRD-3 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for ERVFRD-3 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes ERVFRD-3 survival associations across molecular data types. ERVFRD-3 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (22). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible ERVFRD-3 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High ERVFRD-3 expression shows unfavorable associations in CESC and LUSC, but favorable associations in HNSC, READ, KIRP and BRCA. The HNSC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p = .001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify HNSC as the clearest survival context for ERVFRD-3 RNA expression.
This table summarizes ERVFRD-3 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 8. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for ERVFRD-3. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. ERVFRD-3 shows higher tumor expression in KIRC, KICH, CHOL, STAD, PRAD and ESCA. The KIRC box plot shows higher ERVFRD-3 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.069, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with ERVFRD-3 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, ERVFRD-3 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
