CDH8

associated omics data
Gene

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored CDH8 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. CDH8 expression is associated with patient survival in 20 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, CDH8 is differentially expressed in 10, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, CDH8 RNA expression shows 15,292 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in THYM. Together, these results highlight KIRC, and THYM as cancer lineages where CDH8 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes CDH8 survival associations across molecular data types. CDH8 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (20), followed by mutation status (9) and mass-spec protein abundance (1). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
CDH8 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier20KIRC (73)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier9UCEC (36)view →
Protein (mass-spec)Kaplan–Meier1GBM (3)view →
This table ranks reproducible CDH8 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High CDH8 expression shows unfavorable associations in ACC, MESO, KIRP, LAML and OV, but favorable associations in KIRC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for CDH8 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCOSMedianAll0.8500.759<.00173view →
ACCDFSTertileAll0.3140.904<.00154view →
MESOOSQuartileIII,IV0.3780.782.00345view →
KIRPDFSQuartileAll0.5030.725.00129view →
LAMLDFSTertileAll0.4020.603.01424view →
OVOSMedianII,III,IV0.7970.883.00822view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 20 lineages →

CDH8-KIRC (OS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for CDH8 RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes CDH8 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 10. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
CDH8 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot10KIRC (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for CDH8. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. CDH8 shows lower tumor expression in BRCA and higher tumor expression in KIRC, HNSC, LIHC, LUSC and THCA. The KIRC box plot shows higher CDH8 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.594, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCFemaleIII,IV+0.594<.00111view →
HNSCAllAll+0.530<.0019view →
LIHCAllII,III,IV+0.075<.0018view →
LUSCMaleAll+0.720<.0017view →
BRCAFemaleAll−0.271<.0014view →
THCAAllAll+0.076<.0013view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 10 lineages →

CDH8-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for CDH8 in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with CDH8 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, CDH8 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with THYM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, CDH8 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in LIVER, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BONE and LARGE_INTESTINE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA15,292THYM (7635)view →
Protein (mass-spec)14,832GBM (9865)view →
Mutation
RNA7,065UCEC (2753)view →
Protein (RPPA)73UCEC (45)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)6,800GBM (6800)view →
Function (mass-spec)1,054GBM (1054)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,750LIVER (157)view →
RNA1,405LIVER (343)view →
RNA
RNA6,563BONE (3353)view →
Function (RNA)3,080BONE (1474)view →
Mutation
Mutation6,333LARGE_INTESTINE (5142)view →
RNA2,169LARGE_INTESTINE (1800)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,623SKIN (212)view →
CRISPR1,606LARGE_INTESTINE (196)view →