Q-omics provides the consensus-scored TMEM51-AS1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. TMEM51-AS1 expression is associated with patient survival in 18 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, TMEM51-AS1 is differentially expressed in 10, with the highest sampling consensus in THCA. Additionally, TMEM51-AS1 RNA expression shows 18,381 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Together, these results highlight KIRP, THCA, and UVM as cancer lineages where TMEM51-AS1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for TMEM51-AS1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes TMEM51-AS1 survival associations across molecular data types. TMEM51-AS1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (18). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible TMEM51-AS1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High TMEM51-AS1 expression shows unfavorable associations in THCA and LGG, but favorable associations in KIRP, SKCM, BLCA and DLBC. The KIRP Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p = .002). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRP as the clearest survival context for TMEM51-AS1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes TMEM51-AS1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 10. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for TMEM51-AS1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. TMEM51-AS1 shows lower tumor expression in HNSC and BRCA and higher tumor expression in THCA, LUAD, KICH and COAD. The THCA box plot shows higher TMEM51-AS1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.446, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with TMEM51-AS1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, TMEM51-AS1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UVM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, TMEM51-AS1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD.
