Q-omics provides the consensus-scored TBC1D15 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. TBC1D15 expression is associated with patient survival in 19 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, TBC1D15 is differentially expressed in 13, with the highest sampling consensus in THCA. Additionally, TBC1D15 RNA expression shows 19,863 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in ACC. Together, these results highlight KIRC, THCA, and ACC as cancer lineages where TBC1D15 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for TBC1D15 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes TBC1D15 survival associations across molecular data types. TBC1D15 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (19), followed by mutation status (7) and mass-spec protein abundance (8). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible TBC1D15 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High TBC1D15 expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, ESCA and OV, but favorable associations in KIRC, SKCM and HNSC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for TBC1D15 RNA expression.
This table summarizes TBC1D15 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 13, while mass-spec protein shows differences in 8. The strongest signals are observed in THCA for RNA and CCRCC for protein.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for TBC1D15. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. TBC1D15 shows lower tumor expression in THCA, LUSC, LUAD and UCEC and higher tumor expression in KIRC and HNSC. The THCA box plot shows higher TBC1D15 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.429, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with TBC1D15 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, TBC1D15 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with ACC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, TBC1D15 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SOFT_TISSUE, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in BLOOD_Myeloma and LARGE_INTESTINE.
