Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RUVBL1-AS1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RUVBL1-AS1 expression is associated with patient survival in 20 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in READ. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RUVBL1-AS1 is differentially expressed in 5, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Additionally, RUVBL1-AS1 RNA expression shows 11,946 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LSCC. Together, these results highlight READ, HNSC, and LSCC as cancer lineages where RUVBL1-AS1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RUVBL1-AS1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RUVBL1-AS1 survival associations across molecular data types. RUVBL1-AS1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (20). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RUVBL1-AS1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RUVBL1-AS1 expression shows unfavorable associations in BLCA, THCA, UCEC and CESC, but favorable associations in READ and CHOL. The READ Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p = .004). Together, the overview and detailed table identify READ as the clearest survival context for RUVBL1-AS1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes RUVBL1-AS1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 5. The strongest signals are observed in HNSC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RUVBL1-AS1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RUVBL1-AS1 shows lower tumor expression in BRCA and THCA and higher tumor expression in HNSC, BLCA and KIRP. The HNSC box plot shows higher RUVBL1-AS1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.166, t-test p = .005).
This table shows molecular features associated with RUVBL1-AS1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RUVBL1-AS1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LSCC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
