RNA, U6atac small nuclear 32, pseudogeneGenealiases: []
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored RNU6ATAC32P profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. RNU6ATAC32P expression is associated with patient survival in 18 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, RNU6ATAC32P is differentially expressed in 4, with the highest sampling consensus in KICH. Additionally, RNU6ATAC32P RNA expression shows 6,218 significant pathway-activity associations, with the highest sampling consensus in STAD. Together, these results highlight KIRC, KICH, and STAD as cancer lineages where RNU6ATAC32P shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for RNU6ATAC32P — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes RNU6ATAC32P survival associations across molecular data types. RNU6ATAC32P RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (18). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible RNU6ATAC32P RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High RNU6ATAC32P expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, HNSC, READ, CHOL, DLBC and BRCA. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for RNU6ATAC32P RNA expression.
This table summarizes RNU6ATAC32P tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 4. The strongest signals are observed in KICH for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for RNU6ATAC32P. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. RNU6ATAC32P shows lower tumor expression in CHOL, THCA and KIRC and higher tumor expression in KICH. The KICH box plot shows higher RNU6ATAC32P RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.540, t-test p = .002).
This table shows molecular features associated with RNU6ATAC32P in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, RNU6ATAC32P shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with STAD recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
