MYO16-AS2

associated omics data
MYO16 antisense RNA 2Genealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored MYO16-AS2 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. MYO16-AS2 expression is associated with patient survival in 12 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in UCS. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, MYO16-AS2 is differentially expressed in 1, with the highest sampling consensus in PRAD. Additionally, MYO16-AS2 RNA expression shows 7,481 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UCEC. Together, these results highlight UCS, PRAD, and UCEC as cancer lineages where MYO16-AS2 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes MYO16-AS2 survival associations across molecular data types. MYO16-AS2 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (12). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
MYO16-AS2 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier12UCS (144)view →
This table ranks reproducible MYO16-AS2 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High MYO16-AS2 expression shows unfavorable associations in UCS, HNSC, ACC, COAD, BLCA and STAD. The UCS Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify UCS as the clearest survival context for MYO16-AS2 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
UCSDFSTertileAll0.0680.524<.001144view →
HNSCOSTertileIII,IV0.3830.644<.001141view →
ACCDFSTertileAll0.1540.701<.001129view →
COADOSTertileAll0.1630.870<.00181view →
BLCADFSTertileAll0.1020.599<.00169view →
STADOSTertileAll0.5150.685.01721view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 12 lineages →

MYO16-AS2-UCS (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for MYO16-AS2 RNA expression in UCS: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes MYO16-AS2 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 1. The strongest signals are observed in PRAD for RNA.
MYO16-AS2 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot1PRAD (2)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for MYO16-AS2. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. MYO16-AS2 shows higher tumor expression in PRAD. The PRAD box plot shows higher MYO16-AS2 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.012, t-test p = .042).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
PRADAllAll+0.012.0422view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 1 lineages →

MYO16-AS2-PRAD

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for MYO16-AS2 in PRAD.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with MYO16-AS2 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, MYO16-AS2 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UCEC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA7,481UCEC (3416)view →
Protein (mass-spec)5,590GBM (2942)view →