MT-TF

associated omics data
tRNA-PheGenealiases: []

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored MT-TF profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. MT-TF expression is associated with patient survival in 21 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, MT-TF is differentially expressed in 11, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, MT-TF RNA expression shows 11,154 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in READ. Together, these results highlight KIRC, and READ as cancer lineages where MT-TF shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes MT-TF survival associations across molecular data types. MT-TF RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (21). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
MT-TF data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier21KIRC (58)view →
This table ranks reproducible MT-TF RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High MT-TF expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, but favorable associations in KIRC, BLCA, LUSC, CESC and UCEC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for MT-TF RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
KIRCDFSTertileAll0.7620.575<.00158view →
BLCAOSMedianII,III,IV0.7610.657.00253view →
LUSCOSQuartileAll0.8700.596.00340view →
UVMDFSMedianIII,IV0.3940.923.00129view →
CESCOSTertileIII,IV0.8610.524.00924view →
UCECDFSQuartileAll0.8870.757.00118view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 21 lineages →

MT-TF-KIRC (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for MT-TF RNA expression in KIRC: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes MT-TF tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 11. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
MT-TF data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot11KIRC (10)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for MT-TF. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. MT-TF shows lower tumor expression in KIRC, KIRP, HNSC, LUSC, BRCA and KICH. The KIRC box plot shows higher MT-TF RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −1.233, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRCAllAll−1.233<.00110view →
KIRPMaleII,III,IV−2.778<.0019view →
HNSCMaleII,III,IV−1.630<.0018view →
LUSCFemaleAll−1.712<.0016view →
BRCAAllAll−1.502<.0016view →
KICHAllII,III,IV−1.313.0074view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 11 lineages →

MT-TF-KIRC

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for MT-TF in KIRC.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with MT-TF in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, MT-TF shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with READ recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA11,154READ (2795)view →
Function (RNA)6,805LGG (2014)view →