Q-omics provides the consensus-scored LIF-AS1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. LIF-AS1 expression is associated with patient survival in 20 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, LIF-AS1 is differentially expressed in 8, with the highest sampling consensus in LUSC. Additionally, LIF-AS1 RNA expression shows 10,333 significant protein co-abundance associations, with the highest sampling consensus in GBM. Together, these results highlight KIRC, LUSC, and GBM as cancer lineages where LIF-AS1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for LIF-AS1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes LIF-AS1 survival associations across molecular data types. LIF-AS1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (20). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible LIF-AS1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High LIF-AS1 expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, KIRP, CESC, THYM, HNSC and ACC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for LIF-AS1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes LIF-AS1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 8. The strongest signals are observed in LUSC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for LIF-AS1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. LIF-AS1 shows lower tumor expression in LUSC, UCEC and KICH and higher tumor expression in KIRC, STAD and COAD. The LUSC box plot shows higher LIF-AS1 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.279, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with LIF-AS1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, LIF-AS1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with GBM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
