keratin associated protein 9-1Genealiases: KAP9.1 · KRTAP9L3
Q-omics provides the consensus-scored KRTAP9-1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. KRTAP9-1 expression is associated with patient survival in 13 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, KRTAP9-1 is differentially expressed in 2, with the highest sampling consensus in LUAD. Additionally, KRTAP9-1 RNA expression shows 6,407 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in LIHC. Together, these results highlight KIRC, LUAD, and LIHC as cancer lineages where KRTAP9-1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for KRTAP9-1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes KRTAP9-1 survival associations across molecular data types. KRTAP9-1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (13). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible KRTAP9-1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High KRTAP9-1 expression shows unfavorable associations in KIRC, LIHC, KICH and TGCT, but favorable associations in ESCA and SCLC. The KIRC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the high-expression group declining faster, consistent with the unfavorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify KIRC as the clearest survival context for KRTAP9-1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes KRTAP9-1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 2. The strongest signals are observed in LUSC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for KRTAP9-1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. KRTAP9-1 shows higher tumor expression in LUAD and LUSC. The LUAD box plot shows higher KRTAP9-1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +0.038, t-test p = .002).
This table shows molecular features associated with KRTAP9-1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, KRTAP9-1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with LIHC recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, KRTAP9-1 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in SOFT_TISSUE, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in LUNG_SCLC and LUNG_NSCLC_LUAD.
