DLGAP2

associated omics data
Gene

Q-omics provides the consensus-scored DLGAP2 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. DLGAP2 expression is associated with patient survival in 20 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in LGG. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, DLGAP2 is differentially expressed in 17, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRP. Additionally, DLGAP2 RNA expression shows 14,265 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in TGCT. Together, these results highlight LGG, KIRP, and TGCT as cancer lineages where DLGAP2 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.

Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.

Survival associations

This table summarizes DLGAP2 survival associations across molecular data types. DLGAP2 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (20), followed by mutation status (10). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
DLGAP2 data typeSurvival analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNAKaplan–Meier20LGG (37)view →
MutationKaplan–Meier10UCEC (34)view →
This table ranks reproducible DLGAP2 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High DLGAP2 expression shows unfavorable associations in ACC, but favorable associations in LGG, PAAD, MESO, LUAD and READ. The LGG Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify LGG as the clearest survival context for DLGAP2 RNA expression.
LineageMeasureSplitStageAUC1
high
AUC2
low
pSampling consensus
LGGDFSTertileAll0.4730.305<.00137view →
PAADOSQuartileII,III,IV0.7600.279.00132view →
MESOOSMedianAll0.7680.259<.00124view →
LUADDFSMedianAll0.4440.283.00522view →
ACCOSTertileIII,IV0.2720.877.00919view →
READOSTertileIII,IV0.7520.396.00717view →
Pink = unfavorable, green = favorable. all 20 lineages →

DLGAP2-LGG (DFS)

Kaplan–Meier survival curve for DLGAP2 RNA expression in LGG: high vs low expression groups.

Explore this curve interactively →

Tumor vs Normal expression

This table summarizes DLGAP2 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 17. The strongest signals are observed in KIRP for RNA.
DLGAP2 data typeExpression analysisLineage consensusLineage of highest sampling consensus
RNABox plot17KIRP (11)view →
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for DLGAP2. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. DLGAP2 shows lower tumor expression in KIRP, COAD, THCA, HNSC, KIRC and LUAD. The KIRP box plot shows higher DLGAP2 RNA expression in normal versus tumor tissue (log2 FC = −0.813, t-test p < 0.001).
LineageGenderStageFold-changepSampling consensus
KIRPAllIII,IV−0.813<.00111view →
COADAllAll−0.068<.00110view →
THCAFemaleAll−0.601<.0019view →
HNSCAllAll−0.081<.0018view →
KIRCMaleAll−0.517<.0017view →
LUADFemaleIII,IV−0.111<.0017view →
Green = repressed in tumor. all 17 lineages →

DLGAP2-KIRP

Tumor-vs-normal expression box plot for DLGAP2 in KIRP.

Explore this plot interactively →

Cross-omics associations

This table shows molecular features associated with DLGAP2 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, DLGAP2 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with TGCT recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set. In cancer cell lines, DLGAP2 RNA and mutation anchors are most strongly linked to RNA-expression features, especially in KIDNEY, while CRISPR and shRNA rows add functional-dependency signals in SKIN and LARGE_INTESTINE.
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
RNA
RNA14,265TGCT (4950)view →
Protein (mass-spec)11,965GBM (9261)view →
Protein (mass-spec)
Protein (mass-spec)9,459GBM (9459)view →
RNA2,302GBM (2302)view →
Mutation
RNA4,847UCEC (3118)view →
Protein (RPPA)72UCEC (56)view →
Associated data typeStrength (# associated data)Lineage of highest associated data
CRISPR
CRISPR1,778KIDNEY (201)view →
RNA1,436SKIN (280)view →
Mutation
Mutation5,471LARGE_INTESTINE (4734)view →
RNA739LARGE_INTESTINE (606)view →
shRNA
shRNA1,797LUNG_SCLC (226)view →
RNA1,776BLOOD_Leukemia (340)view →
RNA
RNA861BLOOD_Leukemia (234)view →
Function (RNA)278BLOOD_Leukemia (101)view →