Q-omics provides the consensus-scored TRG-AS1 profile across patient tissues and cancer cell-line models. TRG-AS1 expression is associated with patient survival in 24 of 34 cancer types, with the highest sampling consensus in HNSC. Among the 18 cancer types available for tumor–normal comparison, TRG-AS1 is differentially expressed in 7, with the highest sampling consensus in KIRC. Additionally, TRG-AS1 RNA expression shows 16,226 significant gene co-expression associations, with the highest sampling consensus in UVM. Together, these results highlight HNSC, KIRC, and UVM as cancer lineages where TRG-AS1 shows reproducible signals across survival, tumor–normal expression, and patient cross-omics analyses.
Every result is evaluated using two consensus scores. Sampling consensus measures how consistently a finding is reproduced within a cancer lineage across different conditions. Lineage consensus measures how broadly the result is shared across cancer types, distinguishing pan-cancer signals from lineage-specific patterns.
Premium analyses for TRG-AS1 — synthetic lethality, tumor antigen, and pembrolizumab response.
This table summarizes TRG-AS1 survival associations across molecular data types. TRG-AS1 RNA expression shows survival associations in the most cancer types (24). The rightmost column indicates the cancer type with the highest sampling consensus for each molecular layer.
This table ranks reproducible TRG-AS1 RNA expression–survival associations across cancer types. High TRG-AS1 expression shows unfavorable associations in UVM, LGG and ACC, but favorable associations in HNSC, SKCM and BRCA. The HNSC Kaplan–Meier curve shows clear separation, with the low-expression group declining faster, consistent with the favorable association (log-rank p < 0.001). Together, the overview and detailed table identify HNSC as the clearest survival context for TRG-AS1 RNA expression.
This table summarizes TRG-AS1 tumor–normal expression differences by data type. RNA shows broader differences across cancer types, with a lineage consensus of 7. The strongest signals are observed in KIRC for RNA.
This table ranks reproducible tumor–normal expression differences for TRG-AS1. A negative fold-change indicates higher expression in normal tissue than in tumor tissue. TRG-AS1 shows lower tumor expression in COAD, LUSC, LUAD, THCA and UCEC and higher tumor expression in KIRC. The KIRC box plot shows higher TRG-AS1 RNA expression in tumor versus normal tissue (log2 FC = +1.167, t-test p < 0.001).
This table shows molecular features associated with TRG-AS1 in patient tissues and cancer cell lines. In patient samples, TRG-AS1 shows the broadest associations at the RNA and protein expression levels, with UVM recurring as the lineage with the largest associated feature set.
